Skipper v. McMillan, DD-128
Decision Date | 12 September 1977 |
Docket Number | No. DD-128,DD-128 |
Citation | 349 So.2d 808 |
Parties | Lavine V. SKIPPER, Appellant, v. Finley L. McMILLAN and Jean B. McMillan, his wife, Appellees. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Edgar M. Moore of Smith & Moore, Tallahassee, for appellant.
M. Howard Williams, Tallahassee, for appellees.
Ms. Skipper appeals a judgment of damages in a direct action filed by her against her covenantors for breach of an encumbrance entered in her favor, arguing that the damages awarded were inadequate and that the court erred in failing to award her a reasonable attorney's fee for successfully prosecuting the suit to remove the encumbrance. We affirm.
As to the damages involved for the cost of removing the encumbrance, her house, which was partially on her lot line, we find that the court's award of $3,575.00 damages was supported by competent substantial evidence.
In its final judgment, relating to the award of attorney's fees, the court stated:
There is a division of authority as to whether a plaintiff is allowed to recover costs and attorney fees as part of his damages for breach of covenant. Some cases allow him to recover only the amount of purchase money and expenses. Others allow him to be awarded also the amount he is compelled to pay as costs and expenses in defense of the title, including attorney fees. See Annot., 61 A.L.R. 154-166 (1929); supplemented at 100 A.L.R. 1203-1204 (1936). Those cases cited in the annotations which do allow recovery of attorney fees, however, appear to limit a covenantee to recover his fees from the covenantor only after the covenantee has become legally obligated in a separate action either to maintain or defend title to the premises conveyed. 61 A.L.R. at 161-162.
The general rule relating to expenses of litigation caused by a breach of contract is stated in 5 Corbin Contracts Section 1037, pages 225-226 (1964), as follows:
(Emphasis supplied.)
Florida cases on the subject allow the recovery of attorney fees by the covenantee expended by him in a separate action. Thus a covenantee has been allowed to bring an action against his covenantor for attorney fees and costs expended necessary to quiet title in a separate action...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Reiterer v. Monteil
...is allowed only for fees incurred in the buyer's action against a third party to remove the encumbrance. Skipper v. McMillan, 349 So.2d 808, 809 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977), supports this view. Although Florida case law allows a purchaser to recover from the seller her attorney's fees incurred in a......
-
Tibbetts v. Nichols, 90-1644
...action was made necessary by the covenantor's breach of covenant. Williams v. Azar, 47 So.2d 624 (Fla.1950); Skipper v. McMillan, 349 So.2d 808 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); Needle v. Lowenberg, 421 So.2d 678 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), review denied, 427 So.2d 737 (Fla.1983); Nelson v. Growers Ford Tracto......
-
Mellor v. Chamberlin
...jurisdictions have held that attorney's fees are not recoverable. See Forrer v. Sather, 595 P.2d 1306 (Utah 1979), and Skipper v. McMillan, 349 So.2d 808 (Fla.App.1977). Additionally, it should be noted Mellor did not comply with RAP 18.1(c), which requires the party requesting attorney's f......