Slate v. Mayor

Decision Date27 May 1901
Citation113 Ga. 646,38 S.E. 977
PartiesSLATE et al. v. MAYOR, ETC., OF BLUE RIDGE.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS — STATUTES — ACCEPTANCE—VOTING—REGISTRATION — ELECTION — PLACE OF HOLDING — MANAGERS-QUALIFICATIONS.

1. Where the general assembly passed a local act appertaining to a named municipality, and therein declared that, before such act should become operative, it should be submitted to the qualified voters of the municipality, and that, if the act failed of adoption, the same might, after the expiration of 12 months from the first election, be submitted to another election, a second election, which was actually held more than 12 months after the first, was not void merely because the call fixing its date was made, and notice thereof published, before the 12 months had expired.

2. Where a municipality is authorized to hold an election on the question of adopting an act for the establishment of public schools, and it has no authority of law for ordering a registration, the test for arriving at the number of qualified voters is that prescribed in section 3S0 of the Political Code, viz.: "The tally-sheets of the last general election held in said * * * municipality » * * shall be taken as a correct enumeration of the qualified voters thereof." If the votes in favor of adopting the act equal or exceed two-thirds of the number cast at that election, the act becomes operative; otherwise it does not. The general registration law does not apply to municipal corporations. Floyd Co. v. State, 38 S. E. 37, 112 Ga. 794, and cases cited.

3. Although one of the managers at such election may not have been a freeholder, he was a de facto manager, and his disqualification would not, of itself, render the election void, there being no allegation of fraud, or that the election was not fair and free. Collins v. Huff, 63 Ga. 207; McCrary, Elect. § 247 et seq.; Paine, Elect. § 377 et seq. (a) As shown by the minutes of this court, though it does not so appear in the official report, the case of Walker v. Sanford, 1 S. E. 424, 78 Ga. 165, was decided by but two judges, and therefore it is not binding, and, as to this point, will not be followed.

4. While the act in reference to the establishment of a public school system in Blue Ridge required that elections relating to the adoption of such act should be held under the same rules and regulations as those required in elections for mayor and council, and the charter of the municipality required elections for...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Goolsby v. Stephens
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • May 4, 1923
    ... ... issuance of said bonds, and, as said election was void, the ... judge likewise erred in requiring, by a mandamus absolute, ... the mayor" and aldermen of said city to declare the result of ... said election ...           ... Additional Syllabus by Editorial Staff ...  \xC2" ... Waterworks Co., 106 Ga. 696, 730, 32 S.E. 907; Floyd ... County v. State, 112 Ga. 794, 802, 38 S.E. 37; Slate ... v. Blue Ridge, 113 Ga. 646, 38 S.E. 977 ...          The ... registration provided for must be applicable to all municipal ... ...
  • Harper v. Dotson
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • January 9, 1920
    ... ... Preston v. Culbertson, 58 Cal. 198; Hayes v ... Kirkwood, 136 Cal. 396, 69 P. 30; Laird v ... Boothe, 22 Cal.App. 569, 135 P. 703; Slate v. Mayor ... etc. of City of Blue Ridge, 113 Ga. 646, 38 S.E. 977; ... State v. Shanks, 25 S.D. 55, 125 N.W. 122.) ... Notice ... is not ... ...
  • New v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • March 2, 1951
    ...of the election did not in and of itself vitiate the election. This question was not only squarely ruled on in Slate v. Mayor, etc., of Blue Ridge, 113 Ga. 646(3), 38 S.E. 977, but the court in that case disapproved a contrary ruling by two Judges in Walker v. Sanford, 78 Ga. 165, 1 S.E. 2.......
  • Slate v. Mayor, Etc., of Blue Ridge
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • May 27, 1901
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT