Sledge v. Panhandle & Santa Fé Railway Company
| Decision Date | 27 January 1932 |
| Docket Number | No. 1520-5828.,1520-5828. |
| Citation | Sledge v. Panhandle & Santa Fé Railway Company, 45 S.W.2d 1112 (Tex. 1932) |
| Parties | Josie SLEDGE et al. v. PANHANDLE & SANTA FÉ RAILWAY COMPANY. |
| Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Schenck & Triplett, of Lubbock, for plaintiffs in error.
Wilson, Randal & Kilpatrick, of Lubbock, Madden, Adkins, Pipkin & Keffer, of Amarillo, and Terry, Cavin & Mills, of Galveston, for defendant in error.
The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals, which is found in 31 S.W.(2d) 146, gives a full statement of this case.We have carefully read and considered said opinion, and think that it correctly disposes of this case, and for correct reasons given.
We therefore recommend that the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals be affirmed.
Judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals affirmed, as recommended by the Commission of Appeals...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
11 cases
-
Robertson v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co.
...248 S.W. 667, (Tex.Com.App.), 1923, 27 A.L.R. 927; Panhandle & S.F. Ry. Co. v. Sledge, 31 S.W.2d 146, (Tex.Civ.App.), 1930, Aff. Tex.Com.App., 45 S.W.2d 1112; East Texas Motor Freight Lines v. Loftis, 148 Tex. 242, 223 S.W.2d 613, (1949); Paris & G.N. Ry. Co. v. Stafford, 53 S.W.2d 1019, (T......
-
West Tex. Utilities Co. v. Harris
... ... and wife sued the West Texas Utilities Company for damages caused by the electrocution of their ... decisions are to the same effect: Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Sledge, Tex.Civ.App., 31 ... ...
-
Biggers v. Continental Bus System, Inc.
...not have occurred but for such condition. Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Sledge, Tex.Civ.App., 31 S.W.2d 146, 149; Sledge v. Panhandle & S. F. R. Co., Tex.Com.App., 45 S.W.2d 1112. * * *' Phoenix Refining Co. v. Tips (125 Tex. 69, 81 S.W.2d 61), 'It is well settled that a person is not bound ......
-
Bryant v. Banner Dairies, Inc.
... ... N. R. E.); Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. Bishop, Tex.Civ.App., 203 ... v. Tips, 125 Tex. 69, 81 S.W.2d 60; Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Sledge, Tex.Civ.App., 31 ... S.W.2d 97, 99; Texas Indemnity Insurance Company v. Staggs, 134 Tex. 318, 327, 134 S.W.2d 1026, ... ...
Get Started for Free