Sloan v. State
Decision Date | 23 February 1935 |
Parties | SLOAN v. STATE. |
Court | Tennessee Supreme Court |
Appeal in Error from Criminal Court, Davidson County; Charles Gilbert, Judge.
Alton Sloan was convicted of the charge that, by falsely impersonating another, he received an automobile under a rental contract, and he appeals in error.
Affirmed.
James W. Rutherford, of Nashville, for plaintiff in error.
W. F Barry, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
Sloan was convicted on the charge that, by falsely impersonating another, he received an automobile under a rental contract. From a judgment imposing a sentence of not less than three years in the penitentiary, he has appealed in error.
At about 10 o'clock on the night of August 3, 1934, Sloan went to the place of business of Matthews Company, which was a concern engaged in renting automobiles, and located at Nashville, Tenn. He said to Sanders, an employee of the company, and in charge of its business at the time, that he wished to rent an automobile, stating that his name was J. B King, that he was employed by the Rock City Construction Company, was twenty-two years of age, and lived at Goodlettsville, Tenn. He also gave Sanders references at Goodlettsville, and, after calling up one of them, Sanders had Sloan sign a printed form of a rental contract, one of the terms of which was that the car should not be taken out of the state of Tennessee. This contract was not read by Sloan, as he was not requested to read it by Sanders.
After making a deposit of $8, Sloan obtained the car for the purpose, as he states, of taking a young lady out riding, but finding that she was ill, he went to Goodlettsville, and in company with a young man, named Russell, proceeded to Glasgow, Ky., for the purpose of visiting his aunt, Mrs Harper, who, he states, was ill. At about 7 o'clock on August 4, 1934, while Sloan and Russell were waiting at a gasoline station to meet a mutual friend, named Settle, the chief of police at Glasgow, noticing the car in front of the station, questioned its occupants as to how they had obtained it.
A few hours later, Murray, a member of the Nashville police force, arrested Sloan on the charge that while at Glasgow he had attempted either to sell or to swap the rented automobile. Murray testified that Sloan admitted to him on two occasions on the return trip to Nashville that such was his intention. Sloan and his companion, Russell, denied that any such admission had been made by Sloan, and, while admitting that he did give to Sanders the name of J. B. King when he rented the car, he states that he did so solely for the reason that as he was but eighteen years of age, he believed that he could not obtain the car under a rental contract unless he was twenty-one years of age, and that he never entertained at the time he rented the car any intent fraudulently to deprive the owner of it.
J. B. King, who was a real and not a fictitious person, was twenty-two years of age, worked for the Rock City Construction Company, and lived at Goodlettsville, Tenn. The presentment charged that Sloan unlawfully, falsely, fraudulently, and feloniously obtained possession of the car, and under this charge, and on the proof introduced by the state, Sloan was convicted and sentenced.
The determinative question in the case is whether intent to defraud is an essential element of the offense of false personation. This question is presented directly, for the first time, for decision by this court.
Code 1932, § 10951, reads as follows: "Any person who falsely impersonates another, and, in such assumed character, receives any property of any description, intended to be delivered to the person so personated, shall, on conviction, be punished as if he had stolen the property."
This section of the Code of 1932 defines the offense of false personation exactly, and without amendment, as it is defined by section 4703 of the Code of 1858.
Section 4703 of the Code of 1858, as well as sections 4701, 4702, 4704, and 4705 are codifications of sections 1, 2, and 3 of chapter 48 of the Acts of 1841-42, which sections read as follows:
It is clear that, as defined by section 3, "falsely impersonating another" was classed as one of four methods by which the offense of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Teel v. May Department Stores Co.
...by plaintiff's evidence and it was also immaterial that plaintiff did not intend to defraud the corporate defendant. Sloan v. State, 168 Tenn. 573, 580, 79 S.W.2d 1021. Plaintiff was willingly, knowingly, and intentionally and abetting Leona to obtain and carry away the corporate defendant'......
-
Teel v. May Department Stores Co.
... ... not guilty of the crime of false personation as (a) The ... element of criminal intent, or intent to defraud, was ... lacking; State v. Hefflin, 338 Mo. 236, 89 S.W.2d ... 938, 103 A. L. R. 1301; 25 C. J. 577, 578; 2 Brill Cyclopedia ... of Criminal Law, sec. 1277, p. 1941; ... A. F. Foster. Secs. 4456, 4488, 4835, R. S. 1939; Secs ... 4064, 4096, 4442, R. S. 1929; State v. Kosky, 191 ... Mo. 1, 90 S.W. 454; Sloan v. Tennessee, 168 Tenn ... 573, 79 S.W.2d 1021; State v. Wright, 342 Mo. 58, ... 112 S.W.2d 571; State v. Logan, 344 Mo. 351, 126 ... S.W.2d ... ...
-
Black & Decker (Us), Inc. v. Smith
...getting the goods or choses in action into possession, intended at the time feloniously to steal the same . . . . Sloan v. Tennessee, 168 Tenn. 573, 79 S.W.2d 1021, 1022 (1935) (quoting section 3 of chapter 48 of the Acts of 1841-42, which prohibited "feloniously obtain[ing], or get[ting] i......
- State ex rel. v. Holston Trust Co.