Smail v. Douglas County, A93A2210

Decision Date26 October 1993
Docket NumberNo. A93A2210,A93A2210
Citation437 S.E.2d 824,210 Ga.App. 830
PartiesSMAIL v. DOUGLAS COUNTY, GEORGIA.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Harltey, Rowe & Fowler, Joseph H. Fowler, Douglasville, for appellant.

Michael J. Bowers, Atty. Gen., Cathy A. Cox-Brakefield, Asst. Atty. Gen., Sullivan, Hall, Booth & Smith, Jack G. Slover, Jr., Jeffrey T. Wise, Atlanta, Jennings B. Garbade, Douglasville, for appellee.

BLACKBURN, Judge.

Appellant, Michael Smail, appeals the trial court's award of summary judgment to Douglas County, Georgia, acting by and through the Douglas County Board of Commissioners (the county). The underlying wrongful death action arose out of an incident, on August 25, 1990, in which defendants Eric Prince and Eric Waugh 1 dropped a large rock from the North County Line Bridge onto Michael Smail's vehicle which was traveling on Interstate 20. The rock passed through the windshield above the passenger's seat, crushing appellant's wife, Judy Smail, to death.

On June 28, 1990, the Douglas County Sheriff's Department received three reports of incidents involving rocks or other debris being thrown off the North County Line Bridge onto vehicles traveling on Interstate 20. On August 5, 1990, the Douglas County Sheriff's Department received an additional report regarding the same type of incident and on August 25, 1990, two reports were received, including the Smails' incident report. Smail contends that the county is responsible for the death of his wife because the county had knowledge of the previous incidents and did nothing to prevent such incidents. Specifically, Smail argues that the county allowed a continuing nuisance to be maintained which caused the death of his wife. The county contends that the Georgia Department of Transportation (DOT) designed, constructed, and maintained the bridge and that the DOT was responsible for repairs, alterations, or modifications of the bridge. 2 Furthermore, the county asserts that it did increase police patrols in the area of the bridge.

In order to establish a nuisance, as opposed to mere negligence, Smail must show: "(1) The defect or degree of misfeasance must be to such a degree as would exceed the concept of mere negligence. (A single isolated act of negligence is not sufficient to show such a negligent trespass as would constitute nuisance[.] ) (2) The act must be of some duration ... and the maintenance of the act or defect must be continuous or regularly repetitious, and (3) Failure of the municipality to act within a reasonable time after knowledge of the defect or dangerous condition." (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Denson v. City of Atlanta, 202 Ga.App. 325, 327, 414 S.E.2d 312 (1991). "It has been said that pornography cannot be defined but you...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Rowe v. Coffey
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • March 19, 1999
    ...(absent special relationship, no liability for allegedly negligent inspection of house under construction); Smail v. Douglas County, 210 Ga.App. 830, 831, 437 S.E.2d 824 (1993) (absent special relationship, no liability for failure to provide police protection to woman killed by rock thrown......
  • BRADFORD SQUARE CONDOMINIUM ASS'N v. Miller
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • October 8, 2002
    ...is charged as a continuing wrongdoer is that he is under a legal duty to terminate the cause of the injury."); Smail v. Douglas County, 210 Ga.App. 830, 831, 437 S.E.2d 824 (1993) (absent duty, no liability for failure to provide protection to woman killed by rock thrown from overpass); see......
4 books & journal articles
  • Georgia's Public Duty Doctrine: the Supreme Court Held Hostage - R. Perry Sentell, Jr.
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 51-1, September 1999
    • Invalid date
    ...no specific action that [the police] reasonably failed to take." Id. at 735, 434 S.E. 2d at 552 (Andrews, J., concurring specially). 54. 210 Ga. App. 830, 437 S.E.2d 824 (1993). 55. The rock passed through the windshield of plaintiffs vehicle traveling on the interstate and crushed plaintif......
  • Torts - Cynthia Trimboli Adams and Charles R. Adams, Iii
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 46-1, September 1994
    • Invalid date
    ...was no specific action the police reasonably failed to take and plaintiff could not have reasonably relied on any such action. Id. 297. 210 Ga. App. 830, 437 S.E.2d 824 (1993). 298. Id. at 830, 437 S.E.2d at 824. 299. Id. at 831, 437 S.E.2d at 825. See also City of Lawrenceville v. Macko, 2......
  • Criminal Law - Frank C. Mills, Iii
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 46-1, September 1994
    • Invalid date
    ...at 629. 214. Id. at 251, 443 S.E.2d at 629. 215. Wheeler v. State, 210 Ga. App. 653, 437 S.E.2d 823 (1993). 216. Id. 217. Id. at 653, 437 S.E.2d at 824. 218. Burdette v. State, 210 Ga. App. 471, 472, 436 S.E.2d 502, 504 (1993). 219. See O.C.G.A. Sec. 40-6-123(a) & (b) (1991) which provides:......
  • Local Government Law - R. Perry Sentell, Jr.
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 46-1, September 1994
    • Invalid date
    ...Id. The court reversed the trial judge's refusal to grant the county's motion to dismiss. Id. at 447, 439 s.E.2d at 682. 251. 210 Ga. App. 830, 437 s.E.2d 824 (1993). 252. For background on the "nuisance" exception to local government immunity, see R. Perry Sentell, Jr., Municipal Liability......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT