Smith v. 1990 Mazda 323, 1D12–3683.

Decision Date18 March 2014
Docket NumberNo. 1D12–3683.,1D12–3683.
Citation162 So.3d 14 (Mem)
PartiesWalter Nathaniel SMITH, Appellant, v. John RUTHERFORD, Sheriff, Duval County, Florida, In re: Forfeiture of the following described property: 1990 Mazda 323, Vin:JMIBG2322L0136843, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Walter N. Smith, pro se.

Stephen E.P. Grissett, Assistant State Attorney, Jacksonville, for Appellee.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The final summary judgment for defendant is AFFIRMED. § 95.11(3)(i), Fla. Stat. We find this appeal to be frivolous and filed in bad faith. See § 57.085(9), Fla. Stat.

In addition, upon Appellant's response to this court's order to show cause why he should not be sanctioned for filing this frivolous appeal and for abuse of the court's processes by filing twenty-three other appeals to this court to date, we find that sanctions are appropriate. Fla. R.App. P. 9.410(a). None of Appellant's numerous appeals filed in this court has resulted in meaningful relief but all have required this court to devote its limited resources to processing and evaluating Appellant's meritless claims. See Pettway v. McNeil, 987 So.2d 20 (Fla.2008) ; Robenson v. McNeil, 39 So.3d 350 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).

Accordingly, the Clerk of this Court is hereby instructed to reject any future pleadings, petitions, motions, documents, or other filings submitted by Walter N. Smith, DC # J04026, unless signed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar.

It is so ordered.

WOLF, VAN NORTWICK, and CLARK, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT