Smith v. Bramhall
Decision Date | 08 September 1977 |
Docket Number | No. 5780,5780 |
Citation | 556 S.W.2d 112 |
Parties | Gene SMITH, Trustee and Independent Executor of the Estate of Noel Dean Smith, Deceased, Appellant, v. Mildred Ann BRAMHALL, Individually and as next friend of Molly Ann Smith, a minor, Appellee. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
This is an appeal by defendant Gene Smith, Executor of the Estate of Noel Dean Smith, from judgment against the Estate for child support owed by the deceased at the time of his death.
Plaintiff Mildred Ann Bramhall, Individually and as next friend of Molly Ann Smith, a minor, sued defendant Gene Smith, Trustee and Independent Executor of the Estate of Noel Dean Smith, deceased, alleging plaintiff was the former wife and Molly Ann Smith was the minor daughter of the deceased; that the divorce decree between plaintiff and deceased decreed he pay $50. per month child support for Molly Ann; that he failed to pay; that he died; that claim was presented to defendant who rejected same; and that suit was instituted within 90 days of such rejection.
Defendant filed answer stating plaintiff's cause of action being for unpaid child support payments, not reduced to judgment prior to the death of deceased, in accordance with Section 14.09(c) Texas Family Code, did not survive the death of deceased.
Trial was to the court without a jury, which rendered judgment for plaintiff for $1500. plus $400. attorneys' fees.
Defendant appeals on one point asserting the trial court erred in rendering judgment for plaintiff because "plaintiff is not entitled to recover arrearage in court ordered child support payments from decedent's estate where arrearage was not reduced to judgment prior to decedent's death".
The trial court filed Findings and Conclusions summarized as follows:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1) Mildred Ann Bramhall was divorced from Noel Dean Smith.
2) In such decree Mildred Ann Bramhall was awarded custody of Molly Ann Smith, and Noel Dean Smith was ordered to pay $50. per month child support.
3) Noel Dean Smith fell into arrears and owed $1500. at the time of his death.
4) The nonpayment of child support by Noel Dean Smith was willful.
5) The claim of Mildred Ann Bramhall is just, due and payable and there are no offsets or credits.
6) The claim was timely presented to defendant Gene Smith, Executor who rejected same.
7) Suit was instituted by plaintiff within 90 days of such rejection as required by Section 313 Texas Probate Code.
8) Plaintiff is entitled to $1500. for unpaid child support, plus interest from date of judgment.
9) Plaintiff is entitled to $400. reasonable attorneys' fee.
1) Pursuant to 14.09(c) Texas Family Code, plaintiff is entitled to judgment for $1500. unpaid child support, plus interest from date of judgment, plus reasonable...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Huff v. Huff
...specifically indicated that a § 14.09(c) remedy was not an independent claim for indebtedness. Id. at 514; see also Smith v. Bramhall, 556 S.W.2d 112 (Tex.Civ.App. Waco 1977) writ ref'd n.r.e. per curiam, 563 S.W.2d 238 (Tex.1978) (making the same distinction between § 14.09(c) and a collat......
-
U.S. v. Fleming, 6608
...as approving the conclusion of the Court of Civil Appeals that 'unpaid child support is . . . a debt for which judgment may be taken.' 556 S.W.2d 112, 113. Section 14.09(c) of the Texas Family Code provides only that unpaid child support may be reduced to judgment and enforced by the same m......
-
Pierce v. Higgins
...first impression for this Court. However, other jurisdictions have addressed this exact issue in a variety of ways. In Smith v. Bramhall, Tex.App., 556 S.W.2d 112 (1977) in connection with divorce proceedings, decedent had been ordered to pay child support during his lifetime which he had f......
-
Martin v. Adair
...found only one case holding the estate of a deceased husband liable for the delinquent child support payments. In Smith v. Bramhall, 556 S.W.2d 112 (Tex.Civ.App. Waco 1977), Writ ref'd n. r. e. per curiam, 563 S.W.2d 238 (Tex.1978), the Court of Civil Appeals held that such delinquent payme......