Smith v. Cauthen
Decision Date | 03 April 1911 |
Citation | 98 Miss. 746,54 So. 844 |
Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
Parties | GARNER SMITH v. A. H. CAUTHEN |
October 1910
APPEAL from the circuit court of Madison county, HON.W. A. HENRY Judge.
Action by A. H. Cauthen against Garner Smith. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
Reversed and remanded.
O. A Luckett, E. J. Leonard, Robert Powell, and Flowers, Fletcher & Whitfield, for appellant.
Reid & Foote and H. B. Greaves, for appellee.
Argued orally by R. Powell and R. N. Fletcher, for appellant and W. M. Reid and H. B. Greaves, for appellee.
The appellant, Smith, executed the following option:
After the execution of this option, the appellee advertised the brick plant in question for sale. Later on he advised appellant that he could not get eight thousand dollars for the plant, but could get seven thousand dollars, and urged him to take this amount and to give him a fee of two hundred dollars or three hundred dollars for closing the deal. This offer was not accepted by the appellant, and thereafter appellee advised appellant that he had resold the property for eight thousand dollars, but would make nothing on the deal, and tendered him a deed to be signed; but there arose some misunderstanding about what brick were to be included in the sale, and appellant refused to sign the deed. Thereafter appellee brought suit for breach of contract, for the sum of fifteen hundred dollars damages, alleging that he had resold the property for nine thousand five hundred dollars. From a judgment for the amount sued for, the defendant appeals, alleging as errors, among others, the granting of instructions Nos. 2 and 4, which are as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ivy v. Evans
...A. (N. S.) 522 (Cal.); Cohaba Coal Co. v. Veitch (Ala.), 65 So. 75; 1 Parsons on Contracts (6 Ed.), 427; Note 21 L. R. A. 129; Smith v. Cauther (Miss.), 54 So. 844; Stiger Jaap, 83 Miss. 351; Comstock v. North, 88 Miss. 755; Kolb v. Bennett Land Co., 74 Miss. 567; Davis v. Stout (Ind.), 27 ......
-
Wright v. Mary Galloway Home for Aged Women
...v. Drake, 41 So. 372; Rape v. M. & O. R. Co., 136 Miss. 38; Hollister v. Frellsen, 148 Miss. 568; Stigler v. Jaap, 83 Miss. 351; Smith v. Cauthen, 98 Miss. 746. court will remember from the record that Mrs. McClain was removed from the Home on the 9th of July, about 21 days or 3 weeks befor......
-
Rape v. Mobile & O. R. R. Co.
... ... 596, 15 A. S. R ... 82; Shuler v. Corl, 178 P. 535; Speeder Cycle ... Co. v. Teeters, 18 Ind.App. 474, 48 N.E. 592; ... Bentley v. Smith, 3 Ga.App. 242, 59 S.E. 720; 18 R ... C. L. 494, sec. 4; 18 R. C. L. 510, 511, sections 20 and 21 ... III. A ... promise of a ... employment, and the entering upon a performance of the ... duties, is sufficient to bind the employer. Smith v ... Cauthen, 98 Miss. 746; Sunflower Bank v. Pitts, ... 108 Miss. 380. There is no question here about the contract ... being against public policy. The ... ...
-
Chism v. Hollis
...at bar have been construed, the principle has been uniformly upheld. Kolb v. Bennett Land Co., 74 Miss. 567, 21 So. 233; Smith v. Cauthen, 98 Miss. 746, 54 So. 844; Hollister v. Frellsen, 148 Miss. 568, 114 So. Petroleum Co. v. Coal, Coke & Mfg. Co., 89 Tenn. 381, 18 S.W. 65; Iron Co. v. Tr......