Smith v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co.
Decision Date | 08 December 1880 |
Parties | SMITH v. THE C., R. I. & P. R. CO |
Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court.
THIS is an action to recover damages for personal injuries inflicted by the defendant. Upon the production of the plaintiff's evidence the court, pursuant to a request of defendant instructed the jury to return a verdict for the defendant which was done. The plaintiff excepted and appeals.
AFFIRMED.
Leggett & McKemey, for the appellant.
Slagle Acheson & McCracken, for the appellee.
The evidence shows the following facts: The plaintiff keeps a hotel at Perlee, Jefferson county. The sidetrack of defendant's road passes within about five feet of plaintiff's house. East of this side-track is the depot, and east of the depot the main line. The county road runs east and west just south of plaintiff's house and depot. Across the road there is a small culvert, connecting with a ditch. On the night of the 31st day of July, 1877, a freight train came in from the north, and sidetracked upon the west track, the locomotive extending over the culvert in the road.
The plaintiff in his testimony explains the situation as follows:
Question. "Can you go through there on the south side?"
Answer. "No, sir."
Question. "Can you go through there on the north side?"
Answer. "No, sir."
On cross-examination the witness stated:
The train lay across the highway for about three-quarters of an hour, and was not cut. One Bedford was selling goods at the plaintiff's door. When he heard the freight train coming in from Fairfield he began to gather up his things, saying he wanted to go on the train coming in. Upon this branch of the case the plaintiff testifies as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cherry v. St. Louis & S.F.R. Co.
...over a public crossing. Reimer v. Railroad, 46 F. 344; Railroad v. Pinchin, 13 N.E. 677; Andrews v. Railroad, 12 S.W. 213; Smith v. Railroad, 7 N.W. 398; Lewis Railroad, 38 Md. 588. (2) A child twelve years and nine months old, possessing the intelligence and capacity of plaintiff is treate......
- Smith v. C., R. I. & P. R. Co.