Smith v. City of Algona
Decision Date | 29 September 1942 |
Docket Number | 45858. |
Citation | 5 N.W.2d 625,232 Iowa 362 |
Parties | SMITH v. CITY OF ALGONA. |
Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
James I. Dolliver and D. M. Kelleher, both of Fort Dodge, for appellant.
J D. Lowe, of Algona, for appellee.
The injury to the plaintiff occurred on July 3, 1939, on Park Avenue, near the north limits of the defendant, a city having a population of about 4,000 people. Primary highway 169, which is a part of the road system of Iowa over which the State Highway Commission has complete supervision and control, is routed through Algona over four of its paved streets, one of which is Park Avenue, for a total distance of 7,575 feet. The highway enters the city from the south on Phillips Street which it traverses northward for 3,300 feet, thence west on State Street, the main business street of the defendant, for 1,600 feet, thence north on Jones Street for 900 feet to where the latter street merges into and becomes Park Avenue thence due north on Park Avenue for 525 feet and 1,250 feet northwesterly thereon to the north city limits. This last 1,250 feet of Park Avenue is downgrade and through a pass under the C. M. & St. P. R. R. tracks. The plaintiff and her husband were coming into the city from the north on highway 169. The street, after it passes through the subway under the railroad tracks, turns rather sharply to the southeast up the hill. Immediately to the right of this paved turn, in the shoulder of the street was a deep rut, into which the right wheels passed and caused the car to veer into the pole. The paving on Park Avenue along where the injury occurred and on up the hill was eighteen feet wide. Farther to the south, it was twenty-four feet wide, and at other places along the route of highway 169 through the city the paving was thirty feet wide.
Highway 169 is paved both north and south of the city with a concrete slab 18 feet wide. All of the streets traversed by 169 were graded and paved by the defendant in 1922, and, so far as the record shows, they were always thereafter maintained by the city until the year 1939. On November 15, 1938, the city council of Algona adopted the following resolution:
The chairman of the Commission attached to the resolution the statement that it was approved and accepted by the Commission on November 22, 1938.
The standard highway signs along the course of 169 through the city were furnished and placed by the Commission prior to 1939. During 1939, prior to the date of the injury sustained by plaintiff, a broken portion of pavement along the route other than Park Avenue was repaired, and during freezing weather some of the slopes and approaches to intersections were sanded. There is no evidence that any other maintenance work was done on the streets over which 169 was routed during the year 1939.
The repair of the broken pavement above mentioned was in Call Street which intersects the extension of 169 at a place where the houses average much less than 200 feet apart, and where under the second paragraph of Code section 4755.27, the Commission had no right to make direct repairs, and could only reimburse the defendant for maintenance work which it had done. We have not checked the figures of appellant in her printed argument, but appellee does not question them, that from the intersection of State and Jones Streets, north to the north city limits, a distance of 2,675 feet, there are 45 abutting houses and business houses, and for the whole course of 169 through the city (7,575 feet) the number of such buildings is 119, making an average distance between them in each instance of about 60 feet.
Highway 169 was simply a renumbering of Highway 16 which was made a part of the primary road system in April, 1919, with the route through the city remaining the same.
Section 4755-b29 of the 1935 Code, and Chapter 154 of the Laws of the 47th General Assembly, pursuant to which the resolution of the city council was adopted, are, respectively, now section 4755.27, and section 4755.21 of the Code of 1939, and we will hereinafter refer to the sections by the latter designations.
Section 4755.21 is as follows:
Section 4755.27 is:
The italicized part of the section just quoted is the only part thereof which can have any application to this case.
Plaintiff by her amended petition alleged: Where and how the injury was caused, and the extent and nature of those injuries; that along the right hand side of the pavement, just south of the railroad underpass, there was a rut, next to the pavement, six inches deep and seventy-five feet long, which had been washed out by rains and water and the wheels of cars; that defendant had negligently constructed the pavement with an abrupt jog to the left as you go south, and had negligently permitted the rut to be and remain there, and caused the car in which plaintiff was riding to swerve from the rut against a pole carrying electric wires.
The questions for determination center about Division II of the defendant's second substituted answer, as amended. The facts are set out in the pleadings but are to be taken in the light of a stipulation of facts. The issues before us are issues of law arising upon a motion of the plaintiff to strike, directed at said Division II. This division is intended as a separate and complete defense to plaintiff's cause of action. It...
To continue reading
Request your trial