Smith v. Macbeth
Decision Date | 18 May 1935 |
Citation | 161 So. 721,119 Fla. 796 |
Parties | SMITH v. MACBETH. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Rehearing Denied June 14, 1935.
Suit by E. A. Macbeth against M. A. Smith, substituted for John W Sissons, as liquidator of the Bank of Titusville. Decree for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
Affirmed. Appeal from Circuit Court, Brevard County Frank A. Smith, judge.
Crofton & Wilson, of Titusville, for appellant.
O. S Thacker, of Kissimmee, for appellee.
May 30, 1925, J. L. Easterlin and his wife, B. J. Easterlin, contracted to sell Wm. P. Pastorius certain lands in Brevard county, Fla. Pastorius put up a 'binder' of $250, which, with the deed of conveyance by the Easterlins to him, was placed in the Bank of Titusville & Trust Company with the following letter of instruction, signed by all three parties:
Pastorius later contracted to sell the said lands to appellee, E. A. Macbeth, and on November 13, 1925, placed with the Bank of Titusville & Trust Company the sum of $21,000, paid him by Macbeth, with the following letter of instruction:
'I hand you herewith the sum of $21,000.00 to be held by you in escrow and paid over by you under the following terms and conditions, viz;
'Hence, I am placing with you the sum of $21,000.00 as an evidence of my good faith and willingness to perform all functions by me to be performed as outlined in the escrow agreement.
'You will hold this $21,000.00 and turn it over to J. L. Easterlin and B. J. Easterlin, his wife, when the lis pendens with all attendant appeals will have been adjudicated in favor of J. L. Easterlin and his wife, B. J. Easterlin, and when the records of the County of Brevard will have been purged of any and all liens against the said property conveyed in the deed held by you in escrow.
'However, in the event of an appeal by Allen or his counsel being taken to the Supreme Court of Florida from any finding in the case of Allen vs. Easterlin, then in that event you are empowered to deliver to J. L. Easterlin and B. J. Easterlin, his wife, the sum of $5,000.00 upon their producing to you a receipt for same, acknowledging the same to be a part of the cash payment on the purchase price of the said property; said receipt to acknowledge this escrow letter and be signed by J. L. Easterlin and B. J. Easterlin, his wife, before a Notary Public.
'You are hereby informed that the aforesaid property has been sold to E. A. Macbeth and that the said...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Oginsky v. Paragon Properties of Costa Rica Llc
...to both parties, agreed to by both parties, and it must be communicated to and deposited with a third party.” Smith v. Macbeth, 119 Fla. 796, 803, 161 So. 721, 724 (1935). Contrary to Defendants' argument, Florida law imposes no requirement that the escrow agent sign the escrow agreement fo......
-
Gibson v. Resolution Trust Corp.
...to and deposited with a third party." Aberbach v. Wekiva Assocs., 735 F.Supp. 1032, 1035 (S.D.Fla.1990) (quoting Smith v. Macbeth, 119 Fla. 796, 161 So. 721, 724 (1935)). The third party must not itself be involved in the transaction. E.g., Fleischman v. Department of Professional Regulatio......
-
Oginsky v. Paragon Properties of Costa Rica LLC, CASE NO. 10-21720-CIV-KING
...beneficial to both parties, agreed to by both parties, and it must be communicated to and deposited with a third party." Smith v. Macbeth, 161 So. 721, 803 (Fla. 1935). Contrary to Defendants' argument, Florida law imposes no requirement that the escrow agent sign the escrow agreement for i......
-
Aberbach v. Wekiva Associates, Ltd.
...to both parties, agreed to by both parties, and it must be communicated to and deposited with a third party." Smith v. Macbeth, 119 Fla. 796, 161 So. 721, 724 (1935); see Shultz v. Sun Bank/Naples, N.A., 553 So.2d 202, 205 (Fla.App. 2nd Dist.1989) ("an escrow agreement must be in writing, a......