Smith v. Public Service Commission
Decision Date | 11 December 1961 |
Docket Number | No. 1,No. 48516,48516,1 |
Citation | 351 S.W.2d 768 |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Parties | R. P. SMITH, Chaffee Building & Loan Association, Southeast Missouri Food Dealers Association, Cape Girardeau Central Trades Union, and Cape Girardeau Carpenters Union, Appellants, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION of Missouri, Respondent |
R. P. Smith, Cape Girardeau, for appellants and pro se.
Glenn D. Evans, Gen. Counsel, Thomas J. Downey, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Jefferson City, for respondent Public Service Commission.
Oliver & Oliver, by Jack L. Oliver, Cape Girardeau, for Missouri Utilities Co.
HOLMAN, Commissioner.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Cole County which affirmed an order of the Public Service Commission of Missouri approving a rate schedule for electric energy furnished by Missouri Utilities Company to its customers in a seven-county southeast Missouri area. The approved schedule was designed to produce an increase of approximately $540,000 in the annual gross revenues of the Company. The appellants (named in the caption) are apparently customers of the utility. We have appellate jurisdiction because of the amount in dispute. Smith v. Publice Service Commission of Missouri, Mo.Sup., 336 S.W.2d 491.
Missouri Utilities Company furnishes electrical energy at retail to forty-two communities and adjacent areas, and at wholesale to two communities in the territory here involved. Its generating facilities furnish 68% of its energy requirements and the remaining 32% is purchased, primarily from Union Electric Company. The Company also has an electric distribution system serving a portion of six counties in central Missouri. There is no physical integration between the central and southeast Missouri systems. It also operates a water system at Cape Girardeau and furnishes gas service in various communities in Missouri. As indicated, this proceeding involves only the electrical rates applicable to the southeast Missouri operations of the Company. A number of the cities and towns located in the area protested the increase and their attorneys appeared before the Commission at the various hearings but none of the cities appealed from the order involved.
The amount of the increase sought in the application (filed July 27, 1959) was $608,157. The Commission, by its order, allowed the amount sought after deducting one item of expense which it did not consider proper. That item of $65,000 represented an increase in franchise taxes which the Company had reason to believe would be levied by the cities of the area in the event the rate increase was approved.
There had been no appreciable increase in the rates here involved since 1925. One of the officials of the Company, T. F. Walz, Jr., testified that the increased revenues had not kept pace with the increased expenses and hence there had been a continuing decline in earnings. He further stated that anticipated construction requirements during the five-year period following the date of the application would entail expenditures totaling $5,700,000; that most of said sum would have to be obtained by the sale of long-term securities, and that 'the company will have to keep its earnings up in order to make its securities attractive to the investors.'
J. E. Flanders, a public utility consultant, was employed by the Company 'to make the necessary studies and to prepare exhibits to show the Company's earnings under its present rates, to determine what the Company's earnings should be, and to prepare suggested rates designed to yield the gross revenue necessary to enable the Company to earn a reasonable return on the value of its property used in supplying electric service in its southeast division.' His testimony and exhibits indicate that on December 31, 1958, the value of the Company's electric plant was (1) $10,863,217 on the basis of original cost less depreciation, (2) $17,729,045 on the basis of 'trended' (present day cost) value, and (3) $14,514,713 on the basis of estimated fair value. According to Mr. Flanders the rate of return which the Company received upon its investment for the year 1958 was 4.78% when computed on the 'net plant' basis and 3.65% on the fair value basis. The adjusted net plant rate base arrived at by the staff of the Commission was $11,215,870.
In its order of January 21, 1960, the Commission made findings and conclusions as follows: by 'elimination from the revenues, to be provided by the proposed increased rates, of approximately $65,000 included therein for the purpose of compensating for the increased franchise tax rates' which would result in a 'net operating income of $743,602.38' and
The Company filed its revised schedules of rates and they were approved in an order entered on January 30, 1960. Thereafter, upon motion of appellants a rehearing was granted to consider the revised schedule, particularly as concerned the question of discrimination in the rate applicable to commercial power customers. That hearing was held and the schedule of rates was again approved in a supplemental order entered on April 7, 1960. That order contained findings as follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. Gulf Transport Co. v. Public Service Com'n of State, V-K
... Page 448 ... 658 S.W.2d 448 ... STATE of Missouri, ex rel. GULF TRANSPORT COMPANY, Relator-Appellant, ... PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF the STATE of Missouri, Respondent, ... Mid-American Coaches, Inc., Greyhound Lines, Inc., ... Continental Trailways, Inc., Midwest Buslines, ... Page 473 ... reasonable. Smith v. Public Service Commission, 351 S.W.2d 768, 772 (Mo.1961); State ex rel. Inman Freight System, Inc., v. Public Service Commission, 600 S.W.2d 650, ... ...
-
State ex rel. GTE North, Inc. v. Missouri Public Service Com'n
... ... GTE NORTH, INC. and MCI ... Telecommunications, Corp., Respondents, ... AT & T, Intervenor-Respondent, ... MISSOURI PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, and Southwestern Bell ... Telephone Co., Appellants, ... Office of Public Counsel, Intervenor-Appellant ... No. WD 44143 ... Missouri Court ... Smith v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 351 S.W.2d 768, 771 (Mo.1961). The burden of proof is on the party seeking to set aside the order of the Commission to ... ...
-
State ex rel. Marco Sales, Inc. v. Public Service Com'n
... ... the Public Counsel of the State of Missouri, ... Intervenors-Relators-Respondents, ... PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION of the State of Missouri, Appellant, ... Laclede Gas Company, Intervenor-Appellant ... No. WD 34,997 ... Missouri Court of Appeals, ... upon a reasonable classification corresponding to actual differences in the situation of the consumers or the furnishing of the service.' " Smith v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 351 S.W.2d 768, 771 (Mo.1961). The court in Smith goes on to point out, however, that " 'the reasonableness of the basis of ... ...
-
State ex rel. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co. v. Public Service Commission
... ... It has previously been held that an appeal from the judgment of the circuit court approving the order of the Commission authorizing a rate schedule which will yield an annual increase of gross revenue in excess of its minimum jurisdictional amount vests this court with jurisdiction. Smith v. Public Service Commission, Mo., 351 S.W.2d 768; Smith v. Public Service Commission, Mo., 336 S.W.2d 491. However, jurisdiction on the basis of the amount in dispute attaches only when the amount in controversy, independent of all contingencies, exceeds the minimum jurisdictional amount, Hogue ... ...
-
The Scientific Impossibility of Plausibility
...challenges); Burks v. Amite Cnty. Sch. Dist., 708 So. 2d 1366, 1370 (Miss. 1998) (racial discrimination); Smith v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 351 S.W.2d 768, 772 (Mo. 1961) (revising rate schedules for users of commercial power was not discriminatory); Missouri v. White, 913 S.W.2d 435, 437 (Mo. Ct......