Smith v. Reister

Citation45 N.E. 699,146 Ind. 527
Decision Date07 January 1897
Docket Number18,078
PartiesSmith et al. v. Reister
CourtIndiana Supreme Court

From the Posey Circuit Court.

Affirmed.

E. M. Spencer, for appellants.

William Reister, for appellee.

OPINION

Howard, J.

The appellee made application at the March term, 1896, of the board of commissioners of Posey county for license to sell intoxicating liquors. The appellants filed a remonstrance against the granting of the license, and the license was refused. On appeal to the circuit court a motion to dismiss the remonstrance was sustained, and this ruling is the only error complained of. The motion to dismiss, however, is not made a part of the record by bill of exceptions or order of court, and cannot therefore be considered. Crumley v. Hickman, 92 Ind. 388; Yost v. Conroy, 92 Ind. 464, 47 Am. Rep. 156; Washington Ice Co. v. Lay, 103 Ind. 48, 2 N.E. 222; Board, etc., v. Montgomery, 109 Ind. 69, 9 N.E. 590.

Judgment affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Smith v. Reister
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • January 7, 1897
    ...146 Ind. 52745 N.E. 699SMITH et al.v.REISTER.Supreme Court of Indiana.Jan. 7, Appeal from circuit court, Posey county; O. M. Welbom, Judge. Application by Christian Reister to the board of commissioners of Posey county for license to sell liquors, against the granting of which John C. Smith......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT