Smith v. Seidner, 96-2710
Decision Date | 16 April 1997 |
Docket Number | No. 96-2710,96-2710 |
Citation | 677 N.E.2d 336,78 Ohio St.3d 172 |
Parties | SMITH, Appellant, v. SEIDNER, Warden, Appellee. |
Court | Ohio Supreme Court |
Stanley Smith, pro se.
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Michael L. Bachman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Smith asserts in his sole proposition of law that the court of appeals erred by dismissing his habeas corpus petition. Smith's petition challenged the common pleas court's verdict form because it did not include the physical-harm specification contained in his indictment.
As the court of appeals held, habeas corpus is not available to challenge either the validity or sufficiency of an indictment. State ex rel. Simpson v. Lazaroff (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 571, 664 N.E.2d 937. In addition, habeas corpus is not available to raise claims of improper jury instructions or verdict forms. See, e.g., State ex rel. Richard v. Seidner (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 149, 152, 666 N.E.2d 1134, 1136-1137. Smith's claim could have been raised in a direct appeal from his conviction and sentence. Simpson, 75 Ohio St.3d at 571, 664 N.E.2d at 937; Richard, 76 Ohio St.3d at 152, 666 N.E.2d at 1136-1137; see, also, State v. Hill (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 195, 208-209, 661 N.E.2d 1068, 1081-1082 ( ).
Based on the foregoing, the court of appeals correctly dismissed the petition because Smith possessed an adequate remedy at law by appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.
Judgment affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Sloan
...either the validity or sufficiency of an indictment" since these issues can be raised in a direct appeal. Smith v. Seidner, 78 Ohio St.3d 172, 173, 677 N.E.2d 336 (1997). Further, the charge under this indictment and for which Patterson was convicted was not dismissed at any time.The fact t......
-
Larry Brown v. Thomas A. Haskins, Warden, Case, 99-LW-1361
...See State ex rel. Thomas v. Money (1997), So Ohio St.3d 494, State ex rel. Massie v. Rogers (1997), 77 Ohio St.3d 449, and Smith v. Seidner (1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 172. As petitioner's allegation concerning his indictment, petitioner had an adequate legal remedy by way of direct appeal to cha......
-
McKinney v. Tibbals, Case No. 13 CA 65
...See, e.g., State ex rel. Richard v. Seidner (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 149, 152, 666 N.E.2d 1134, 1136-1137." Smith v. Seidner, 1997-Ohio-224, 78 Ohio St. 3d 172, 173, 677 N.E.2d 336 (1997). {¶7} Further, Petitioner has or had an adequate remedy at law by way of filing an application to reopen h......
-
Kevin B. Gunnell v. Jeffery Wolfe, Warden, Noble Correctional Institution,. Case, 02-LW-2717
... ... State ex rel. Massie v. Rogers (1997), ... 77 Ohio St.3d 449, 449-450, 674 N.E.2d 1383; Smith v ... Seidner_(1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 172, 173, 677 N.E.2d ... As ... regards the ... ...