Smith v. Southland Suites of Ormond Beach, LLC.

• Citation: 148 So.3d 1251 (Mem)
• Decision Date: 09 October 2014
• Docket Number: No. SC10–631.,SC10–631.
• Parties: Ellen Lucille SMITH, etc., et al., Petitioners, v. SOUTHLAND SUITES OF ORMOND BEACH, LLC., et al., Respondents.
• Court: Florida Supreme Court

148 So.3d 1251 (Mem)

Ellen Lucille SMITH, etc., et al., Petitioners
v.
SOUTHLAND SUITES OF ORMOND BEACH, LLC., et al., Respondents.

No. SC10–631.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 9, 2014.

Isaac Ramon Ruiz–Carus and Megan Leigh Gisclar of Wilkes & McHugh, P.A., Tampa, FL, for Petitioners.

Thomas Anthony Valdez of Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A., Tampa, FL, and Robindra Nath Khanal of Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A., Orlando, FL, for Respondents.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeal in Estate of Smith v. Southland Suites of Ormond Beach, LLC., 28 So.3d 103 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. After further consideration, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss this review proceeding.

It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur.

LEWIS, J., dissents.