Smith v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co.
Citation | 171 S.W. 635 |
Decision Date | 12 December 1914 |
Docket Number | No. 1259.,1259. |
Parties | SMITH et al. v. ST. LOUIS SOUTHWESTERN RY. CO. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Dunklin County; W. S. C. Walker, Judge.
Action by W. E. Smith and others, composing the firm of Smith, McMillan & Co., against the St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals. Reversed.
Wammack & Welborn, of Bloomfield, and Sam H. West, of St. Louis, for appellant.
The plaintiffs, a partnership, brought suit against the defendant railway company for damages occasioned by a delay in the shipment of a car load of hogs which were loaded and turned over to the railway company on January 7, 1913. The shipment was from Malden, Mo., and was consigned to the Dimmitt-Caudle Smith Commission Company of the National Stock Yards in the state of Illinois. The plaintiffs' evidence showed that the car was delayed on account of a defective drawhead, and that by reason thereof the plaintiffs were damaged on account of shrinkage in weight.
Plaintiffs admitted that the hogs were shipped under a contract with the defendant which contained the following provision:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cunningham v. Missouri Pac. R. Co.
...S. W. 182; Dunlap v. Railroad, 187 Mo. App. 201, 172 S. W. 1178; McElvain v. Railroad, 176 Mo. App. 379, 158 S. W. 464; Smith v. Railroad, 186 Mo. App. 401, 171 S. W. 635. The federal decisions on which this rule is based are referred to in the cases cited and those below mentioned. By refe......
-
Johnson v. Missouri Pac. Ry. Co.
...as to notice bars the shipper's action. McElvain v. St. Louis, etc., R. Co., 176 Mo. App. 379, 158 S. W. 464; Smith v. St. Louis, etc., R. Co., 186 Mo. App. 401, 171 S. W. 635. Notations on the freight bill that the freight is in bad order do not constitute such notice, nor take the place t......
- Smith v. St. Louis And Southwestern Railway Company