Smith v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co.

Citation171 S.W. 635
Decision Date12 December 1914
Docket NumberNo. 1259.,1259.
PartiesSMITH et al. v. ST. LOUIS SOUTHWESTERN RY. CO.
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dunklin County; W. S. C. Walker, Judge.

Action by W. E. Smith and others, composing the firm of Smith, McMillan & Co., against the St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals. Reversed.

Wammack & Welborn, of Bloomfield, and Sam H. West, of St. Louis, for appellant.

FARRINGTON, J.

The plaintiffs, a partnership, brought suit against the defendant railway company for damages occasioned by a delay in the shipment of a car load of hogs which were loaded and turned over to the railway company on January 7, 1913. The shipment was from Malden, Mo., and was consigned to the Dimmitt-Caudle Smith Commission Company of the National Stock Yards in the state of Illinois. The plaintiffs' evidence showed that the car was delayed on account of a defective drawhead, and that by reason thereof the plaintiffs were damaged on account of shrinkage in weight.

Plaintiffs admitted that the hogs were shipped under a contract with the defendant which contained the following provision:

"Tenth. That as a condition precedent to the collection of any damages, for any loss or injury to live stock covered by this contract, the shipper will give notice in writing of the claim therefor to some general officer or the nearest station agent of the carrier, or to the agent at destination, as the case may be, and, before such stock is mingled with other stock, such written notice to be served within one day after delivery of the stock at destination. The purpose of requiring this notice is to enable the carrier to investigate and settle such claims before suit is instituted, and no action for any such damages shall be brought or maintained unless the notice in writing mentioned in this paragraph be given within one...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Cunningham v. Missouri Pac. R. Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • March 27, 1920
    ...S. W. 182; Dunlap v. Railroad, 187 Mo. App. 201, 172 S. W. 1178; McElvain v. Railroad, 176 Mo. App. 379, 158 S. W. 464; Smith v. Railroad, 186 Mo. App. 401, 171 S. W. 635. The federal decisions on which this rule is based are referred to in the cases cited and those below mentioned. By refe......
  • Johnson v. Missouri Pac. Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • June 12, 1916
    ...as to notice bars the shipper's action. McElvain v. St. Louis, etc., R. Co., 176 Mo. App. 379, 158 S. W. 464; Smith v. St. Louis, etc., R. Co., 186 Mo. App. 401, 171 S. W. 635. Notations on the freight bill that the freight is in bad order do not constitute such notice, nor take the place t......
  • Smith v. St. Louis And Southwestern Railway Company
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • December 12, 1914

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT