Smith v. State

Decision Date15 November 1916
Docket Number56.
Citation90 S.E. 713,146 Ga. 76
PartiesSMITH v. STATE.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Syllabus by the Court.

There was no error in causing two jurors to be set aside for cause, who, upon their voir dire, stated that they were opposed to capital punishment in cases dependent upon circumstantial evidence.

This case depends entirely upon circumstantial evidence, but the proved facts were not only consistent with guilt, but were sufficient to exclude every other reasonable hypothesis. The trial court approved the verdict, and no errors of law were committed.

Error from Superior Court, Chatham County; W. G. Charlton, Judge.

Frank Smith was convicted of crime, and brings error. Affirmed.

Atkinson and Gilbert, JJ., dissent as to the sufficiency of the evidence.

J. J. Bouhan and P. W. Meldrim, both of Savannah, for plaintiff in error.

Walter C. Hartridge, Sol. Gen., of Savannah, Clifford Walker, Atty. Gen., and Mark Bolding, of Atlanta, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except ATKINSON and GILBERT, JJ., dissenting.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Swain v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • September 25, 1926
    ... ... circumstantial evidence. The court did not err in its ruling ... Where the capital punishment can be inflicted, a juror who is ... opposed to capital punishment is incompetent to try such a ... case. The exact point was expressly ruled in Smith v ... State, 146 Ga. 76, 90 S.E. 713; and in Mickens v ... State, 149 Ga. 185, 99 S.E. 779, it was held: ... "On the trial of one indicted for murder the court ... properly held a person incompetent who, in reply to the ... statutory question on the voir dire, testified: 'I am ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT