Smith v. State

CourtAlabama Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtTHOMAS, Justice.
CitationSmith v. State, 229 Ala. 207, 157 So. 874 (Ala. 1934)
Decision Date14 June 1934
Docket Number8 Div. 591.
PartiesSMITH v. STATE.

Rehearing Denied June 28, 1934.

Certiorari to Court of Appeals.

Tom B Smith was convicted of embezzlement, and appealed to the Court of Appeals. The judgment of conviction being there reversed, the state applies for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review the judgment and decision of that court in Smith v. State, 157 So. 872.

Writ awarded.

See also, --- So. ---.

Thos E. Knight, Jr., Atty. Gen., and Thos. Seay Lawson, Asst Atty. Gen., for the State.

Bradshaw & Barnett and C. P. Almon, all of Florence, for respondent.

THOMAS Justice.

The writ of certiorari will be awarded.

It is shown that the city of Florence was collecting the gasoline tax imposed by that municipality and paid by the distributors; that certain companies had paid the tax and had not received credit; that witness Baylor wrote letters to these companies, getting appellant to sign said letters, calling for lists of sales and payments made by them to the city under the ordinance; that replies thereto were received, giving lists and payments by said companies to said official (appellant) of the city; that he, witness Baylor, "showed these replies to appellant who admitted * * * that the amounts * * * had been sent by the respective companies to the city; received; and the same appropriated by appellant to his own use."

The corpus delicti is shown, by the recital in the opinion, that the issues raised were properly submitted to the jury before the last ruling was made.

The undisputed admissions or confessions made by defendant to witness Baylor, and shown by the record, proved his guilt.

Admissions of incompetent evidence are harmless, where the fact to which that evidence relates is otherwise established by competent evidence. 9 Alabama and...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
6 cases
  • DeBruce v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • August 14, 1984
    ...evidence are harmless, where the fact to which that evidence relates is otherwise established by competent evidence." Smith v. State, 229 Ala. 207, 157 So. 874 (1934). Error in the admission of hearsay testimony is harmless where the testimony is cumulative. Cobern v. State, 273 Ala. 547, 5......
  • Smith v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • January 22, 1952
    ...Sec. 3961 which is the progenitor of Sec. 127, Title 14, supra. This view was not disapproved by the Supreme Court on certiorari. 229 Ala. 207, 157 So. 874; 230 Ala. 700, 159 So. In consonance with these authorities and the historical background of the statute in question, we think that the......
  • Hammond v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • November 12, 1986
    ...evidence are harmless, where the fact to which that evidence relates is otherwise established by competent evidence." Smith v. State, 229 Ala. 207, 208, 157 So. 874 (1934). III The trial judge properly sustained defense counsel's objection to the prosecutor's statement in closing argument t......
  • Cassidy v. State, 5 Div. 429
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • March 27, 1979
    ...of incompetent evidence is harmless where the facts thereby disclosed are otherwise established by competent evidence. Smith v. State, 229 Ala. 207, 157 So. 874 (1934). A judgment will not be reversed because of the admission of incompetent evidence, where the other evidence, which was unco......
  • Get Started for Free