Smith v. State, Y-500.

Decision Date06 January 1976
Docket NumberNo. Y-500.,Y-500.
Citation324 So.2d 699
PartiesForrest Eugene SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant's sole point on appeal is:

"The lower court erred in accepting Appellant's plea of guilty and adjudging him guilty and sentencing him for the offense of grand larceny on the ground that Appellant could not be adjudged guilty and sentenced for such offense without being legally charged with the commission of the offense of grand larceny."

Appellee State, in its brief, answers as follows:

"This question is answered in the affirmative. Appellee agrees with the argument set forth in appellant's very excellent and well-reasoned brief. Appellant was not charged with the offense of grand larceny and neither was he charged with a crime of which grand larceny is a lesser included offense. No separate information was filed against appellant nor even an amended information was filed charging him with the offense of grand larceny. And as the saying goes, the allegata does not meet the probata. It comes down to this: Appellant was adjudicated guilty of and sentenced for an offense for which he was not charged. This is an absolute denial of due process. Thornhill v. Alabama, 310 U.S. 88 60 S.Ct. 736, 84 L.Ed. 1093 (1940)."

The judgment of conviction is reversed.

Reversed.

RAWLS, Acting C.J., and MILLS and SMITH, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Corn v. State, 46922
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • March 19, 1976
    ...Dist. 1975); Haley v. State, 315 So.2d 525 (Fla.App.2d Dist. 1975). See Long v. State, 92 So.2d 259 (Fla. 1957); Smith v. State, 324 So.2d 699 (Fla.App.1st Dist. 1976); Rodgers v. State, 325 So.2d 48 (Fla.App.2d Dist. 1975); Causey v. State, 307 So.2d 197 (Fla.App.2d Dist. 1975); Priester v......
  • State v. Dye, 49579
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • May 19, 1977
    ...No essential element should be left to inference. Corn v. State, 332 So.2d 4, 12 (Fla.1976) (Hatchett, J., dissenting). Smith v. State, 324 So.2d 699 (Fla.1st DCA 1976); Evanco v. State, 318 So.2d 535 (Fla.1st DCA 1975); Haley v. State, 315 So.2d 525 (Fla.2d DCA 1975); Rodgers v. State, 325......
  • Akins v. State, 96-300
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • April 16, 1997
    ...information failed to charge a crime and conviction for nonexistent offense is reversible fundamental error). See Smith v. State, 324 So.2d 699, 700 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976). In the instant case appellant was charged by indictment, and Florida cases have long held that an indictment, unlike an i......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT