Smith v. State
Decision Date | 01 October 2010 |
Docket Number | No. A10A1704.,A10A1704. |
Citation | 306 Ga.App. 301,702 S.E.2d 211,10 FCDR 3302 |
Parties | SMITH v. The STATE. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Jones, Osteen & Jones, Linnie L. Darden, III, Hinesville, for appellant.
Julia F. Slater, District Attorney, Jennifer E. Dunlap, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.
On appeal from his conviction for attempted child molestation and other crimes, Marvin Smith argues inter alia that the evidence was insufficient and that the State's peremptory strikes deprived him of a fair trial under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). We find that the evidence against Smith was sufficient to sustain his conviction. However, because Smith made out a prima facie case of discrimination by reason of the State's strikes of two African-American veniremen resulting in the total exclusion of African-Americans from the jury, and because the trial court did not authorize the State to refute Smith's prima facie case with race-neutral explanations of the strikes, we vacate that portion of the trial court's order concerning Smith's Batson challenge and remand for further proceedings.
"On appeal from a criminal conviction, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, with the defendant no longer enjoying a presumption of innocence." Reese v. State, 270 Ga.App. 522, 523, 607 S.E.2d 165 (2004). We neither weigh the evidence nor judge the credibility of witnesses, but determine only whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, a "rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt." Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319(III)(B), 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979).
So viewed, the record shows that on July 15, 2006, a volunteer associated with a citizens' group and acting in concert with police received an online message from Smith and told him that she was 15 years old. Smith, who is African-American and was 35 years old at the time, sent pictures of himself to the woman. As their conversations continued over the next twelve days, the two discussed the sexual acts that might take place if they met, and Smith directed her to pornography sites showing African-American men having sex with white women. Smith acted throughout under the assumption that the woman was a girl of 15, telling her that "I could get in lots of trouble," "I could go to jail," and that he had been with girls as young as 14 in the past. After 12 days of conversations, the woman gave Smith her address. Smith drove to her house in the Nissan Altima he had named to the woman as his car. When police identified themselves there, Smith fled before being apprehended.
Before trial, Smith moved to change venue, arguing that television and newspaper coverage of the events at issue made a fair trial impossible. The trial court granted the motion and directed the parties to negotiate on an appropriate venue for trial. After denying the State's motion for reconsideration, the trial court ordered thecase transferred to Whitfield County. A jury found Smith guilty of attempted child molestation, attempted enticement of a child for indecent purposes, and obstruction. The trial court entered judgment on the verdict and sentenced Smith to 25 years with 13 to serve. Smith's motion for new trial was denied.
1. The evidence outlined above, including Smith's engaging in sexually explicit conversations, driving to an arranged meeting place, and fleeing from officers there, was sufficient to sustain Smith's conviction. See
OCGA §§ 16-4-1 (defining criminal attempt), 16-6-4 (defining child molestation), 16-6-5 (defining enticement of a child for indecent purposes), 16-10-24 (defining obstruction of a law enforcement officer); see also Dennard v. State, 243 Ga.App. 868, 870-871(1), 534 S.E.2d 182 (2000) ( ).
2. Smith argues that the State's peremptory strikes of two African-Americans from the venire, resulting in an all-white jury, deprived him of a fair trial.
The transcript of voir dire shows that the venire in this case consisted of fifty-seven whites and three African-Americans, such that it was approximately five percent African-American. Immediately after examination of the first African-American venireman, the State indicated its intention of removing him for being less than forthcoming about his criminal history, which included an armed robbery charge. When the State struck this first African-American venireman, Smith did not object. The State did not raise any objection to the second African-American venireman immediately after his examination, but later struck him nonetheless. Smith objected to this strike, which was made when no veniremen were present. The State thus used two of its six peremptory strikes, or thirty-three percent of such strikes, on the two African-Americans reached from the venire before the completion of the panel. Citing Copeland v. State, 281 Ga.App. 11, 635 S.E.2d 283 (2006), the trial court held that because no prima facie case of discrimination was made out, no further proceedings on Smith's challenge to the second venireman were necessary.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Lopez v. State
...v. State, 321 Ga.App. at 423–424, 740 S.E.2d 400; Logan v. State, 309 Ga.App. at 99–100(2)(a), 709 S.E.2d 302; Smith v. State, 306 Ga.App. 301, 302(1), 702 S.E.2d 211 (2010). Accordingly, Lopez's argument lacks merit as to Count 2. 2. Lopez contends that, as applied, OCGA § 16–12–100.2(d)(1......
-
Castaneira v. State
...on his person, sufficed to show that defendant took a substantial step toward committing child molestation); Smith v. State, 306 Ga.App. 301, 302(1), 702 S.E.2d 211 (2010) (affirming conviction for attempted child molestation where evidence showed that defendant engaged in sexually explicit......
-
Ultra Telecom, Inc. v. Merchandise
...of a prima facie showing is moot); Bryant v. State, 309 Ga.App. 649, 651(2), 710 S.E.2d 854 (2011) (same). 15.See Smith v. State, 306 Ga.App. 301, 303(2), 702 S.E.2d 211 (2010) (holding that peremptory strikes of jurors, resulting in total exclusion of that juror's race from the jury, estab......
-
Logan v. the State.
...the victim to perform a sex act was sufficient to support conviction for attempted child molestation). 16. See Smith v. State, 306 Ga.App. 301, 302(1), 702 S.E.2d 211 (2010) (affirming conviction for attempted child molestation because the defendant engaged in sexually explicit conversation......