Smith v. State
Decision Date | 21 December 1949 |
Docket Number | No. 24565,24565 |
Parties | SMITH v. STATE. |
Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
Nelson J. Munger, Houston, King C. Haynie (on appeal only), Houston, for appellant.
A. C. Winborn, Criminal District Attorney Houston, E. T. Branch, Asst. Crim. Dist. Atty., Houston, George P. Blackburn, State's Atty., of Austin, for the State.
Appellant was charged with the killing of Leslie D. Gibbins with malice, and upon conviction, he was assessed the penalty of death.
The proof shows that appellant and a companion prepared themselves for a robbery of the deceased who was a bus driver; and appellant, being possessed of a pistol, these two men boarded this bus at nighttime. Appellant's companion announced that 'this is a stick up.' Appellant then presented the pistol at the deceased, who gave the companion some money from his shirt. He was immediately shot by appellant while doing something with his money changer, and Mr. Gibbins (the deceased) soon died from this bullet wound in his body. He endeavored to say something to those who soon discovered him, but he was unable to speak and was dead when the ambulance arrived.
Appellant made a written statement relative to the matter, to the introduction of which no objection was made. He also told the officers where the pistol would be found where he had hidden the same, and at such place they found a pistol from which the State showed that the bullet in deceased's body was fired. Appellant also took the stand and told practically the same story as set forth in his confession. He was positively identified with his companion as seen leaving this bus immediately after the witness heard a shot. Appellant's written statement reads in part as follows:
There is nothing said in the statement about an accidental shooting. However, in appellant's testimony on the witness stand he says that when Gibbins leaned forward toward the money changer that the confederate (Blackmon) bumped appellant's arm and the pistol was accidentally discharged and the deceased was shot. From appellant's testimony we quote:
Appellant objected to the court's charge because same failed to instruct the jury that if, this gun was accidentally discharged, the defendant was entitled to an acquittal. Such a charge was refused by the trial court,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Rodriguez v. State
...robbery, Lyons v. State, 138 Tex.Cr.R. 375, 136 S.W.2d 835 (1940), or other felony pursuant to Article 42, P.C.1925; Smith v. State, 154 Tex.Cr.R. 234, 225 S.W.2d 846 (1949). Kuykendall, 609 S.W.2d at 795-96. See generally George Wilfred Stumberg, Criminal Homicide in Texas, 16 Tex. L.Rev. ......
-
Caraway v. State
...while the defendant was preparing or committing a felony. Hodges v. State, 160 Tex.Cr.R. 579, 272 S.W.2d 902 (1954); Smith v. State, 154 Tex.Cr.R. 234, 225 S.W.2d 846 (1949); McElroy v. State, 134 Tex.Cr.R. 445, 115 S.W.2d 971 (1938). Further, this Court has held that an instruction elimina......
-
Dickson v. State
...upon the question of murder without malice where the defendant killed the deceased during an act of robbery. See also Smith v. State, 154 Tex.Cr.R. 234, 225 S.W.2d 846; Smith v. State, 168 Tex.Cr.R. 102, 323 S.W.2d 443; David v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 453 S.W.2d 172. Cf. Cassell v. State, 154 ......
-
Sargent v. State, 49271
...as a defense, under Art. 42, V.A.P.C., is proper, Marrufo v. State, 172 Tex.Cr.R. 398, 357 S.W.2d 761 (1962); Smith v. State, 154 Tex.Cr.R. 234, 225 S.W.2d 846 (1949); McElroy v. State, 134 Tex.Cr.R. 445, 115 S.W.2d 971 (1938), notwithstanding the fact that the indictment alleged only murde......