Smith v. State, 89-434

Decision Date20 October 1989
Docket NumberNo. 89-434,89-434
Citation550 So.2d 174,14 Fla. L. Weekly 2475
Parties14 Fla. L. Weekly 2475 Gary Joe SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, and David A. Davis, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Carolyn J. Mosley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Gary Joe Smith was convicted upon his plea of nolo contendere to two counts of attempted sexual battery on a child less than twelve years of age. §§ 777.04(4) and 794.011(2), Fla.Stat. (1987). He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to withdraw the plea and proceed to jury trial without affording him an evidentiary hearing. See Rule 3.170(f), Fla.R.Crim.P. The motion, made pro se 1 prior to the imposition of sentence, asserted essentially that when the plea was entered he had been drinking a substantial quantity of liquor, that he "had drank too much," that he was scared and under much stress and duress, that he did not commit the offenses charged, and that he wanted a jury trial. Smith also asserted that he had witnesses who could testify that he was drinking. We conclude that the grounds of the motion were sufficient to warrant an evidentiary hearing at which the defendant could present testimony in support of his contentions. See Yesnes v. State, 440 So.2d 628, 634 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). Accordingly, the cause is reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

ERVIN, NIMMONS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

1 The defendant personally requested the court to permit him to withdraw the plea. The public defender representing appellant stated he was not in position to make any comment on the defendant's motion at that time.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • MacKenzie Ins. Agencies, Inc. v. ATF Lines, Inc.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • October 20, 1989
    ... ... jurisdiction over one who contracts to insure any person, property, or risk located in the state at the time of the contract ...         We find that, in light of the uncontroverted ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT