Smith v. State, 5D01-316.
Decision Date | 21 December 2001 |
Docket Number | No. 5D01-316.,5D01-316. |
Citation | 801 So.2d 1043 |
Parties | Marion Alonzo SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Leonard R. Ross, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and David H. Foxman, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
Marion Alonzo Smith appeals his sentence following his conviction for burglary of a structure. We reverse.
During his plea and sentencing hearing, the state raised the issue of restitution:
The defense objected:
I just want to object to any kind of judgment for money at this point. There's been no evidence with respect to any of these numbers. We just have the State Attorney testifying as to the numbers. It was my understanding that the [victims] were down here anyway.
The trial court denied the objection. As part of his sentence, a restitution judgment in the amount of $880.00 was entered, in favor of the county commission. Smith appeals the restitution order.
receded from on other grounds, Locke v. State, 719 So.2d 1249 (Fla.1998).
Smith further submits that the county commission "is not a victim in this case and can not receive restitution." He relies on ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Trotter v. State
... ... 2d DCA 2001); Williams v. State, 801 So.2d 301, 302 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Diaz v. State, 790 So.2d 523, 523 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Smith v. State, 800 So.2d 752, 753 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); St. Lawrence v. State, 785 So.2d 728, 729-30 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). These district court decisions ... ...
-
State v. Dixon
...court was required to hear evidence on the matter." (first citing § 775.089(7), Fla. Stat. (2002), and then citing Smith v. State, 801 So. 2d 1043, 1045 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) )); Strickland v. State, 746 So. 2d 1189, 1190 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) ("When a defendant objects to restitution and reques......
-
Lewis v. State
...court was required to hear evidence on the matter." (first citing § 775.089(7), Fla. Stat. (2002) ; and then citing Smith v. State, 801 So. 2d 1043, 1045 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) )); Strickland, 746 So. 2d at 1190 ("[S]ection 775.089(7) contemplates an evidentiary hearing when there is a dispute......
- Trotter v. State