Smith v. State

Decision Date20 September 1999
Docket NumberNo. S99A1421.,S99A1421.
Citation271 Ga. 507,521 S.E.2d 562
PartiesSMITH v. The STATE.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

J. Robert Joiner, Atlanta, for appellant.

Paul L. Howard, District Attorney, Bettieanne C. Hart, Elizabeth A. Baker, Assistant District Attorneys, Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Paula K. Smith, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne K. Strickland, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

HUNSTEIN, Justice.

Roderick R. Smith, Jr. was convicted of felony murder and aggravated assault in the shooting death of Abubeker Ebro Ali and was sentenced to life imprisonment. He appeals from the denial of his motion for a new trial.1

1. The evidence adduced at trial authorized the jury to find that around 5:00 a.m. on September 15, 1996, Ali, the night manager of an Atlanta convenience store, ordered two men out of the store who were trying to sell crack cocaine. An hour later, appellant entered the store and began to argue with Ali. Ali exited the protected cubicle around the cash register, carrying a baseball bat which he held in the middle. The only other customer inside the store overheard Ali telling appellant that he "[didn't] want to be bothered." The customer then heard gunshots. Another witness testified he was crossing the street when he noticed appellant outside the store while Ali was in the store's doorway; the witness first heard gunshots, saw Ali fall and appellant lean inside the door, and then heard more gunshots; and the witness then saw appellant fleeing the scene holding something silver in his hands. Ali died from a gunshot, fired at close range, that entered the right side of his face and neck and traveled through his chest and arm. That evening, appellant told a friend he killed Ali because the victim was going to call the police to report Smith for selling drugs outside the store.

We find this evidence sufficient to authorize a rational trier of fact to find appellant guilty of felony murder and aggravated assault beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979).

2. We find no error in the trial court's refusal to give appellant's requested charge on voluntary manslaughter. The trial court charged the jury regarding self-defense. Even assuming, arguendo, that the victim's behavior in approaching appellant with a bat constituted "serious provocation," there is no evidence that appellant was "so influenced and excited that he reacted passionately rather than simply in an attempt to defend himself." (Footnote omitted.) Worthem v. State, 270 Ga. 469, 471, 509 S.E.2d 922 (1999). Accordingly, no charge on voluntary manslaughter was authorized here. Id.

3. Appellant contends the trial court committed reversible error by denying his motion for a mistrial after a witness, in an unresponsive answer to a question on cross-examination,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Davis v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 28 Abril 2009
    ...lack of apparent prejudice, we find no abuse of discretion in the denial of [the] motion() for mistrial.' [Cit.]" Smith v. State, 271 Ga. 507, 508(3), 521 S.E.2d 562 (1999). As for the detective's testimony, Davis "did not raise [an ultimate issue] objection at trial, and is therefore proce......
  • Myrick v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 20 Marzo 2000
    ...not moved by passion or prejudice because it acquitted Myrick of the other, more serious, charges against him. See Smith v. State, 271 Ga. 507, 508(3), 521 S.E.2d 562 (1999). The trial court did not err in admitting this 2. In his final enumeration of error, Myrick complains that the trial ......
  • Alexis v. State, S00A1909.
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 22 Enero 2001
    ...acted solely out of passion in response to a provocation that would have caused a reasonable person to act as he did. Smith v. State, 271 Ga. 507(2), 521 S.E.2d 562 (1999). Appellant did not testify that he was angry when he shot Glenda. Rather, appellant testified that he was trying to cal......
  • Evans v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 8 Julio 2014
    ...one of the three remaining counts showed that the jurors were not prejudiced by evidence of the other crimes. See Smith v. State, 271 Ga. 507, 508(3), 521 S.E.2d 562 (1999) (lack of apparent prejudice where jury acquitted defendant on malice murder and convicted instead on felony murder). A......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT