Smith v. State
Decision Date | 09 September 2019 |
Docket Number | S19A0491 |
Citation | 306 Ga. 753,833 S.E.2d 117 |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Parties | SMITH v. The STATE. |
Dell Jackson, for appellant.
Paul L. Howard, Jr., District Attorney, Lyndsey H. Rudder, Stephany J. Luttrell, Assistant District Attorneys; Christopher M. Carr, Attorney General, Patricia B. Attaway Burton, Deputy Attorney General, Paula K. Smith, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Meghan H. Hill, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
AppellantTalib Nasheef Smith was convicted of murder, criminal street gang activity, and other crimes in connection with the 2013 shooting death of Khaseim Daru Walton.He appeals, asserting insufficiency of the evidence to support his convictions and error in a jury instruction.For the reasons stated below, we affirm.1
1.In Stripling v. State , 304 Ga. 131, 816 S.E.2d 663(2018), this Court affirmed the convictions of Smith’s co-defendantsTshombe Stripling and Elijah Brewer, who were tried together with Smith.There, this Court summarized the evidence, in the light most favorable to the verdicts, as follows:
(Footnotes omitted.)Stripling , 304 Ga. at 132-134, 816 S.E.2d 663.A gang expert also testified that Id. at 133 n.2, 816 S.E.2d 663.
When evaluating a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, this Court views all of the evidence presented at trial in the light most favorable to the verdicts and asks whether any rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the crimes of which he was convicted.SeeJackson v. Virginia , 443 U. S. 307, 319 (III)(B), 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560(1979).On appeal, "this Court defers to the jury’s assessment of the weight and credibility of the evidence."(Citation and punctuation omitted.)Manning v. State , 303 Ga. 723, 724 (1), 814 S.E.2d 730(2018).And "it was for the jury to determine the credibility of the witnesses and to resolve any conflicts or inconsistencies in the evidence."(Citations and punctuation omitted.)Stripling,304 Ga. at 135 (1)(b), 816 S.E.2d 663.
(a) Smith first contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his murder conviction, arguing that Traylor was unsure in her testimony that she saw him at the scene and that Whibbey identified Neddrick as the shooter rather than Smith.But Smith’s brothers, Nierris and Neddrick, told police that they saw Smith get out of the black SUV before the shooting, and Whibbey testified that the individuals from that vehicle were the ones who shot Walton.And while Whibbey initially thought that Neddrick was the shooter, he acknowledged that he only had a "side view" of the shooter and that Neddrick and Smith "look so closely related."Neddrick and Smith’s mother acknowledged that resemblance, indicated that they both believed Smith may have been involved in the shooting, and further admitted that, shortly after the shooting, they saw Smith distraught, threatening suicide, and pacing with a...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Bullard v. State
...he was convicted. See Jackson v. Virginia , 443 U.S. 307, 319, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). See also Smith v. State , 306 Ga. 753, 757, 833 S.E.2d 117, 121 (2019) (affirming conviction for violation of the Street Gang Act where the evidence showed, among other things, that the vict......
-
Bates v. State
...[the victim] to meet with them under the guise of a drug transaction and then rob [the victim] of his money and/or phone"); Smith v. State-306 Ga. 753-758 (2) (b)-833 S.E.2d 117 (2019) (not error to instruct Jury about conspiracy when evidence showed defendant and his co-defendants "rode to......
-
Taylor v. State
...of the acts done, the relation of the parties, the interest of the alleged conspirators, and other circumstances. Smith v. State , 306 Ga. 753, 758 (2), 833 S.E.2d 117 (2019) (citations and punctuation omitted). "And, only slight evidence is necessary to warrant a charge on the subject of c......
-
Martin v. State
... ... Hogue, for appellant. L. Craig Fraser, District Attorney, Kelli M. Adams, Jason M. Rea, Assistant District Attorneys; Christopher M. Carr, Attorney General, Patricia B. Attaway Burton, Deputy Attorney General, Paula K. Smith, Senior Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Benham, Justice.306 Ga. 747 Appellant Deondra Martin was convicted of felony murder and possession of a knife during the commission of a felony in connection with the stabbing death of her husband, Christopher Washington.1 On appeal, Martin 833 ... ...