Smith v. State

Decision Date09 September 2019
Docket NumberS19A0491
Citation306 Ga. 753,833 S.E.2d 117
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court
Parties SMITH v. The STATE.

Dell Jackson, for appellant.

Paul L. Howard, Jr., District Attorney, Lyndsey H. Rudder, Stephany J. Luttrell, Assistant District Attorneys; Christopher M. Carr, Attorney General, Patricia B. Attaway Burton, Deputy Attorney General, Paula K. Smith, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Meghan H. Hill, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Boggs, Justice.

AppellantTalib Nasheef Smith was convicted of murder, criminal street gang activity, and other crimes in connection with the 2013 shooting death of Khaseim Daru Walton.He appeals, asserting insufficiency of the evidence to support his convictions and error in a jury instruction.For the reasons stated below, we affirm.1

1.In Stripling v. State , 304 Ga. 131, 816 S.E.2d 663(2018), this Court affirmed the convictions of Smith’s co-defendantsTshombe Stripling and Elijah Brewer, who were tried together with Smith.There, this Court summarized the evidence, in the light most favorable to the verdicts, as follows:

Walton was a cocaine dealer.Shortly before 9:00 p.m. on November 25, 2013, he drove one of his clients, Gloria Traylor, to a rooming house in the Oakland City area of Atlanta to show her a room that he was planning to rent as a place at which he could sell drugs.As they approached the house, Traylor saw a man she knew as "Chalee" standing outside near a vehicle that looked like a Suburban or a truck.At trial, Traylor identified Talib Smith as Chalee.A short time later, when Walton and Traylor were backing up to leave the house, a man got out of the Suburban-like vehicle, approached the driver’s side of Walton’s car, and asked to buy some drugs.After Walton prepared the cocaine, there was a struggle between him and the man standing outside the car.Traylor then saw three guns pointed in the driver’s side window; she heard shots and ducked down.Walton drove into a pole, and Traylor got out of the car screaming.Walton had been shot four times; he died from his injuries soon after he arrived at the hospital.Traylor could not identify the man who asked to buy drugs or any of the people holding the guns.
Paul Whibbey, the manager of the rooming house, looked out his window when he heard a commotion around the time of the shooting.He saw four individuals walking toward Walton’s car from a black SUV.Whibbey testified that one had short dreadlocks and another had well-kept dreadlocks.At the time of the shooting, Stripling and Talib had twists or dreadlocks; Brewer did not have dreadlocks.Whibbey heard the people saying "get this, get that, get his money."He saw the man with the well-kept dreadlocks shoot a gun and heard eight or nine shots.Then the four individuals got back in the SUV and left.After the shooting, Whibbey was interviewed by Detective Kevin Leonpacher of the Atlanta Police Department, and he identified Neddrick Smith from a photo lineup as the shooter.
Neddrick, who had dreadlocks, was arrested and interviewed by the police.He denied any involvement in the shooting.He said that he had driven his Kia sedan to the rooming house that day with his brothers, Nemiyas and Nierris Smith, and Monquel Yancey to buy a heater from someone who lived there, but he had driven away from the house and just arrived at his aunt’s house nearby when he heard the shots.He jumped back in his car and returned to the rooming house to investigate.He also said that his brother Talib, who some people say looks like him, may have been involved in the shooting.[2]
Nemiyas and Nierris also were interviewed by Detective Leonpacher, and their interviews were played for the jury after the two brothers testified and said that they did not remember most of what they had said in their interviews.Nemiyas told the detective that when he was outside the rooming house with Neddrick, Nierris, and Yancey before the shooting, he saw Knuckles (Stripling’s nickname), Tommy Gunz(Brewer’s nickname), Talib, Katrina Shardow, and someone named Pat pull up in a black Jeep and Talib get out.Nemiyas said that all of those people were members of the Bloods gang.Nierris similarly told Detective Leonpacher that he saw five people in a Jeep, including Talib, "Shombe,""Elijah," and a woman; Nierris identified Tshombe Stripling in a photo lineup as being in the Jeep, but did not identify Elijah Brewer in a lineup.About a week before the murder, Shardow had rented a black Jeep Cherokee SUV.Three weeks after the murder, she reported the SUV stolen; the police found it on fire a few minutes later.
Eleven shell casings were found at the scene of Walton’s shooting, and ballistics testing showed that they were fired from at least three and as many as five different .45-caliber guns.One set of shell casings matched casings left by the gun Stripling used in a different shooting nine days after the murder.A cell phone that belonged to Brewer was found in a driveway at the scene.Brewer told his girlfriend that he had dropped the phone when there was a shooting and he ran.Cell phone records showed that Brewer, Stripling, and Talib were in frequent contact and near each other on the day of the shooting, including in Oakland City.About 30 minutes after the shooting, Stripling’s phone called Neddrick’s phone; Neddrick told Detective Leonpacher that this call was from Talib using Stripling’s phone.[3]
Stripling did not testify at trial, but Detective Leonpacher testified that Stripling had admitted to him in an interview that Stripling was a member of the Bloods. ...Brewer testified at trial that he was a member of the Nine Trey Bloods and was part of a group that committed credit card fraud for the gang.He also said that Shardow was a member of the gang and Talib was affiliated with the gang.

(Footnotes omitted.)Stripling , 304 Ga. at 132-134, 816 S.E.2d 663.A gang expert also testified that "a faction of the Bloods known as the Nine Trey Bloods is active in the Oakland City area and commits various violent crimes, including murders and armed robberies.The gang makes most of its money through robberies, including robberies of drug dealers."Id. at 133 n.2, 816 S.E.2d 663.

When evaluating a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, this Court views all of the evidence presented at trial in the light most favorable to the verdicts and asks whether any rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the crimes of which he was convicted.SeeJackson v. Virginia , 443 U. S. 307, 319 (III)(B), 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560(1979).On appeal, "this Court defers to the jury’s assessment of the weight and credibility of the evidence."(Citation and punctuation omitted.)Manning v. State , 303 Ga. 723, 724 (1), 814 S.E.2d 730(2018).And "it was for the jury to determine the credibility of the witnesses and to resolve any conflicts or inconsistencies in the evidence."(Citations and punctuation omitted.)Stripling,304 Ga. at 135 (1)(b), 816 S.E.2d 663.

(a) Smith first contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his murder conviction, arguing that Traylor was unsure in her testimony that she saw him at the scene and that Whibbey identified Neddrick as the shooter rather than Smith.But Smith’s brothers, Nierris and Neddrick, told police that they saw Smith get out of the black SUV before the shooting, and Whibbey testified that the individuals from that vehicle were the ones who shot Walton.And while Whibbey initially thought that Neddrick was the shooter, he acknowledged that he only had a "side view" of the shooter and that Neddrick and Smith "look so closely related."Neddrick and Smith’s mother acknowledged that resemblance, indicated that they both believed Smith may have been involved in the shooting, and further admitted that, shortly after the shooting, they saw Smith distraught, threatening suicide, and pacing with a...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • Bullard v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 23 Diciembre 2019
    ...he was convicted. See Jackson v. Virginia , 443 U.S. 307, 319, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). See also Smith v. State , 306 Ga. 753, 757, 833 S.E.2d 117, 121 (2019) (affirming conviction for violation of the Street Gang Act where the evidence showed, among other things, that the vict......
  • Bates v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 19 Diciembre 2023
    ...[the victim] to meet with them under the guise of a drug transaction and then rob [the victim] of his money and/or phone"); Smith v. State-306 Ga. 753-758 (2) (b)-833 S.E.2d 117 (2019) (not error to instruct Jury about conspiracy when evidence showed defendant and his co-defendants "rode to......
  • Taylor v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 21 Junio 2021
    ...of the acts done, the relation of the parties, the interest of the alleged conspirators, and other circumstances. Smith v. State , 306 Ga. 753, 758 (2), 833 S.E.2d 117 (2019) (citations and punctuation omitted). "And, only slight evidence is necessary to warrant a charge on the subject of c......
  • Martin v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 9 Septiembre 2019
    ... ... Hogue, for appellant. L. Craig Fraser, District Attorney, Kelli M. Adams, Jason M. Rea, Assistant District Attorneys; Christopher M. Carr, Attorney General, Patricia B. Attaway Burton, Deputy Attorney General, Paula K. Smith, Senior Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Benham, Justice.306 Ga. 747 Appellant Deondra Martin was convicted of felony murder and possession of a knife during the commission of a felony in connection with the stabbing death of her husband, Christopher Washington.1 On appeal, Martin 833 ... ...