Smith v. Warren

Decision Date16 August 2000
Docket NumberNo. 00-429.,00-429.
Citation89 Ohio St.3d 467,732 NE 2d 992
PartiesSMITH, APPELLANT, v. WARREN, JUDGE, APPELLEE.
CourtOhio Supreme Court

Tobe Smith, pro se.

Jana E. Gutman, Allen County Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Smith asserts that the court of appeals erred in dismissing his prohibition action. Smith's assertion is meritless.

Prohibition will not issue if relator has an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law. State ex rel. Kreps v. Christiansen (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 313, 316, 725 N.E.2d 663, 667. Appeal, not prohibition, is the remedy for the correction of errors or irregularities of a court having proper jurisdiction. State ex rel. Jackson v. Miller (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 541, 543, 700 N.E.2d 1273, 1275. Smith's assertion of sentencing error is nonjurisdictional, and he had an adequate remedy by appeal to raise this issue. Smith v. Walker (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 431, 432, 700 N.E.2d 592. Therefore, he was not entitled to the requested extraordinary relief in prohibition.

Based on the foregoing, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Bowen v. Sheldon
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • 16 Marzo 2010
    ...writ. See, generally, Majoros v. Collins (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 442, 443, 596 N.E.2d 1038 (habeas corpus); Smith v. Warren (2000), 89 Ohio St.3d 467, 468, 732 N.E.2d 992 State ex rel. Corrigan v. Lawther (1988), 39 Ohio St.3d 157, 158, 529 N.E.2d 1377 (mandamus). [Petitioner] has or had adeq......
  • State ex rel. Jaffal v. Calabrese
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • 8 Junio 2005
    ...writ. See, generally, Majoros v. Collins (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 442, 443, 596 N.E.2d 1038 (habeas corpus); Smith v. Warren (2000), 89 Ohio St.3d 467, 468, 732 N.E.2d 992 (prohibition); State ex rel. Corrigan v. Lawther (1988), 39 Ohio St.3d 157, 158, 529 N.E.2d 1377 (mandamus). Jaffal has or......
  • Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Pavlik, 00-400.
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • 16 Agosto 2000
  • State v. Judge Dick Ambrose
    • United States
    • Ohio Court of Appeals
    • 19 Septiembre 2016
    ...proper jurisdiction over a criminal matter, may not be remedied through an extraordinary writ. See generally Smith v. Warren, 89 Ohio St.3d 467, 732 N.E.2d 992 (2000) (prohibition); Majoros v. Collins, 64 Ohio St.3d 442, 596 N.E.2d 1038 (1992) (habeas corpus); State ex rel. Corrigan v. Lawt......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT