Smith v. Weitzel
Decision Date | 01 April 1960 |
Citation | 47 Tenn.App. 375,338 S.W.2d 628 |
Parties | Helen Walters SMITH and Myrtle Walters, Blackwell v. William M. WEITZEL, Maurice L. Weitzel, Betty McCleod, Corinne Walters. |
Court | Tennessee Court of Appeals |
Alexander W. Cortner, Clarksville, E. J. Walsh, Quentin Householder, Nashville, Marks & Fleming, Clarksville, for plaintiff in error.
Watkins, McGugin & Stewart, W. P. Cooper, Nashville, for defendant in error.
This is an appeal in error from a judgment of the Third Circuit Court of Davidson County, Tennessee, wherein there were admitted to probate eight envelopes containing certain stock certificates as parts of the entire last will and testament of Nan Dabney Hughes, deceased.
In the reply brief of the defendant in error, Corinne Walters, counsel make the following pertinent statement as to the question to be considered on appeal;
'This is a will contest case in which the contestants (appellants here) raise no question respecting the intention of the testatrix, testamentary capacity, fraud or undue influence.
'The sole question is whether purely technical considerations shall be permitted to defeat the manifest intention of the testatrix.
A clear and concise statement of the history of the proceedings in the County Court as presented to the Circuit Court is contained in the declaration of the Southern Trust Company, Executor of the estate of Nan Dabney Hughes, deceased, which declaration was filed in the Circuit Court of Davidson County.
Said declaration is as follows;
'To all of the foregoing petitions Myrtle Walters Blackwell and Helen Walters Smith filed a demurrer; and at the hearing of the cause in the County Court on February 24, 1959, His Honor, the County Court Judge, held that a contest had been and was presented and ordered the fact of contest and the entire record, including the aforementioned petitions, answers, cross-petition and demurrer, to be certified to the Circuit Court.
'Alexander W. Cortner /s/
'Alexander W. Cortner, Attorney for the Executor, Southern Trust Company.'
A declaration was also filed by the plaintiffs, Maurice L. Weitzel, and William M. Weitzel, as individuals and as executors of Mrs. Junie V. Weitzel, deceased, and Betty McLeod joined in said declaration.
Plaintiff, Corinne Walters, also filed a declaration in the Circuit Court, said declaration averring among other things;
'Plaintiff Corinne Walters produces in open Court eight envelopes (and their contents) each containing endorsements and other writings on its cover; all in the handwriting of the deceased, Nan Dabney Hughes, all of which were found in the bank lock box of said decedent after her death, and which are identified, incorporated, and included by reference in the documents dated June 30, 1949, and December 19, 1953, which have been probated as her Last Will and Testament and as a Codicil thereto on May 16, 1957, in the County Court of Davidson County, Tennessee, and duly recorded therein in Book 69, page 447.'
The declarations of all of these parties aver that the envelopes and their contents are subject to probate as parts of the Last Will and Testament of Nan Dabney Hughes which they propose to prove in solemn form.
In the Circuit Court the contestants filed a demurrer which clearly sets out the various grounds upon which they rely. These grounds being included in the assignments of error will be discussed hereinafter.
The demurrers were heard and overruled by Circuit Judge, Henry F. Todd, following which special pleas and replications thereto were filed.
The trial Judge entered an order setting out the issues to be submitted to the jury wherein it was recited that the proponents produced in open court certain paper writings which included the original will of June 30, 1949, the codicil thereto of December 19, 1953, and listed the various envelopes with the names of the proposed recipients thereon which the proponents aver constitute all of the Last Will and Testament of Nan Dabney Hughes, deceased, and offer to prove same in solemn form and demand a jury to try the cause.
The decree then recites;
'And the contestants, Helen Walters Smith and Myrtle Walters Blackwell, come and defend and aver that they admit that the said documents dated June 30, 1949 and December 19, 1953, are the last will and testament of Nan Dabney Hughes, but deny that said envelopes and/or any of them or any of their contents constitute any part of the valid last will and testament of Nan Dabney Hughes.
'This order is entered by the Court to make up the issues in this cause in lieu of pleadings heretofore filed by the parties in this Court and cause.
'Entered June 18, 1959.
'Henry F. Todd /s/
'Judge'
As hereinabove indicated, the cause was tried before the Judge and a jury with the issue submitted to the jury as to whether the papers in question constitute a part of the Will of Nan Dabney Hughes, and the jury found the issues in favor of the proponents. The decree of the Court setting out and describing the Will, the Codicil and the various envelopes, recites that they do in fact constitute the whole Last Will and Testament of Nan Dabney Hughes and are admitted to probate in solemn form as such.
After a motion for a new trial was heard and overruled, the cause was appealed in error to this Court.
Nan Dabney Hughes was an educated, cultured woman of mature years who had considerable business experience. She had a substantial estate consisting of a valuable home-place with household furniture and furnishings located in Nashville, Tennessee, and considerable personal property constiting mainly of common stocks which were found in envelopes in her lock-box in the First National Bank of Clarksville, Tennessee.
It is seen that there is no question made as to the validity and binding effect of the Will executed June 30, 1949 and the codicil dated December 19, 1953, both which Will and Codicil were originally probated in the County Court of Davidson...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Stephens
...the verdict is his [or her] own." Id. at 609; see also Davis v. Wilson, 522 S.W.2d 872, 883 (Tenn.Ct. App.1974); Smith v. Weitzel, 47 Tenn. App. 375, 338 S.W.2d 628, 638 (1960). Id. at 479. The Clayton Court further observed that, "[a]s in the case of jury voir dire, `[t]he trial court has ......
-
Davis v. Wilson
...some doubt as to the unanimity of the jury, counsel should have moved for a poll in a particular form. As stated in Smith v. Weitzel, 47 Tenn.App. 375, 338 S.W.2d 628 (1960), 'As was said in Dixon Stave & Heading Co. v. Archer, 40 Tenn.App. 327, 291 S.W.2d 603, in the absence of a statute p......
-
In re Will of Tipler, 10 S.W.3d 244, Appeal No. 02A01-9707-PB-00173
...independent significance applies in the case at bar. Tennessee recognizes the doctrine of independent significance. Smith v. Weitzel, 47 Tenn. App. 375, 338 S.W.2d 628, 637 (Tenn. 1960) ("As to the proposition of independent significance… we call attention to Sec. 54.2 of Scott on Scott on ......
-
State v. Clayton, M2002-00058-CCA-R3-CD.
...the verdict is his [or her] own." Id. at 609; see also Davis v. Wilson, 522 S.W.2d 872, 883 (Tenn.Ct.App.1974); Smith v. Weitzel, 47 Tenn.App. 375, 338 S.W.2d 628, 638 (1960). Thus, it stands to reason that the trial court's determination of whether a juror's answer to the jury poll is equi......