Smith v. Whidden

Decision Date25 April 1956
Citation87 So.2d 42
PartiesFrank Elliot SMITH, Appellant, v. J. O. WHIDDEN, Appellee.
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

Mellor & Watson, Fort Myers, for appellant.

Stewart & Stewart, Fort Myers, for appellee.

THORNAL, Justice.

Appellant Smith who was defendant below seeks reversal of a judgment for appellee Whidden who was plaintiff below in an action for damages resulting from the collision of two automobiles.

Appellant urges three points for reversal, to-wit: (a) he contends that when a husband sues for the wrongful death of his wife and includes a claim for loss of services, he should be required to prove that he had actually replaced, or will actually replace, his wife's services by hired help as a condition to recovery, (b) the trial judge refused to charge the jury on the matter of the contributory negligence of the plaintiff, and (c) a $13,000 verdict in favor of an 80-year old husband suing for the death of his 59-year old wife, with a 5-year joint life expectancy, was excessive under the facts of this case.

The tragic collision occurred when appellee Whidden accompanied by his wife was driving his automobile at a moderate rate of speed on the proper side of a public highway. Apparently appellant Smith, who was driving his car in the opposite direction, lost control of his automobile when a third car attempted to pass the Whidden vehicle. The Smith car veered off the pavement and then turned sharply toward the Whidden car, skidded 110 feet and plowed into the Whidden automobile with the resultant damage to the vehicle, some physical injury to Whidden and the death of Mrs. Whidden, apparently from the shock of the collision. Whidden thereupon sued Smith seeking recovery for the damages to his automobile, expenses for doctors and funeral bills as well as for the injury to himself and the usual claims for damages resulting from the death of his wife.

After hearing all of the testimony, including the fact that Whidden was 80 years of age, his wife was 59, and that they had a joint life expectancy of 5 years, the jury rendered a verdict of $13,000 in favor of appellee Whidden. A judgment was entered against appellant and this appeal ensued.

On the first proposition urged by the appellant Smith, the record shows that Mrs. Whidden rendered all of the usual and customary domestic services to be rendered by a wife in the financial circumstances of the parties. She took care of the house, fixed the meals, did the laundry, cared for her husband who was not in good health, and did the other chores that a normal wife in her circumstances would expect to do. Since her death, her husband has lived part of the time with his children by a former marriage, and part of the time with...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Braz
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 25 Enero 1966
    ...be no case in Florida which is directly applicable; however, the cases of Lithgow v. Hamilton, Fla.1954, 69 So.2d 776, and Smith v. Whidden, Fla.1956, 87 So.2d 42, did establish that 'persons' who qualify as experts in the employment service field may testify as to the proper value of the s......
  • Stevens Markets, Inc. v. Markantonatos, 64-746
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 22 Junio 1965
    ...Bondholders Corporation, 128 Fla. 722, 175 So. 529; Winn & Lovett Grocery Co. v. Archer, 1936, 126 Fla. 308, 171 So. 214; Smith v. Whidden, Fla.1956, 87 So.2d 42; Garrison v. Hertz Corporation, Fla.App.1961, 129 So.2d 452; David Properties, Inc. v. Selk, Fla.App.1963, 151 So.2d 334; Hart Pr......
  • Masvidal v. Ochoa
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 7 Abril 1987
    ...breached any agreement between the parties. This being so, there was no obligation to charge the jury on this claim. See Smith v. Whidden, 87 So.2d 42, 44 (Fla.1956); C.A. Davis, Inc. v. City of Miami, 400 So.2d 536, 539 (Fla. 3d DCA), pet. for review dismissed, 411 So.2d 380 (Fla.1981); Ci......
  • Young v. Greiner Engineering Sciences, Inc.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 13 Noviembre 1984
    ...Mason & Spring and Harriet Lewis, Miami, for appellees. Before HENDRY, BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Smith v. Whidden, 87 So.2d 42 (Fla.1956); Bessett v. Hackett, 66 So.2d 694 (Fla.1953); Banfield v. Addington, 104 Fla. 661, 140 So. 893 (1932); Fruehauf Corp. v. Aetna ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT