Smith v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc., 87-2583
Decision Date | 26 July 1988 |
Docket Number | No. 87-2583,87-2583 |
Citation | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1776,528 So.2d 987 |
Parties | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1776 Rosa SMITH and Columbus Smith, Appellants, v. WINN DIXIE STORES, INC., Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Proenza, White & Huck and William J. Howell, Jr. and H. Mark Vieth, Miami, for appellants.
Richard N. Blank, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
We affirm the summary judgment for the defendant, Winn Dixie Stores, Inc., because there is no evidence as to the length of time the "green leafy substance" upon which the plaintiff allegedly slipped was on the floor, and, as this court has observed, "the fact that there is no inspection for a given length of time in itself provides no proof that the defect was actually there for a sufficient period to place the landowner on reasonable notice of its existence." McCanick v. W.J.A. Realty Limited Partnership, 516 So.2d 1129, 1130 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Borroto v. Wal-Mart Stores E.
...(S.D. Fla. May 29, 2020); Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. King, 592 So. 2d 705, 707 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991); Smith v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc., 528 So. 2d 987, 987 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988). Borroto cites several cases for the proposition that failure to inspect is evidence of constructive noti......
-
Holman v. Guardianship of Ferber
... ... under record evidence); Marchion Terrazzo, Inc. v. Altman, 372 So.2d 512, 514 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979) ... ...