Smith v. Youngblood
Decision Date | 09 June 1900 |
Citation | 58 S.W. 42 |
Parties | SMITH et al. v. YOUNGBLOOD. |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
Appeal from circuit court, Pope county, in chancery; Jeremiah G. Wallace, Judge.
Action by T. C. Smith and others against F. F. Youngblood to compel the performance of a trust. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals. Affirmed.
Dan B. Granger and J. T. Bullock, for appellant. R. B. Wilson, for appellees.
The court below found "that on or about the 1st day of May, 1882, Amanda Youngblood * * * gave to defendant, F. F. Youngblood, the fund sued for, to wit, $1,600, for the plaintiffs, to be held by him for them for and during the term of her natural life, and to be paid over to plaintiffs in equal proportions at her death; she reserving the interest for her life for the support and maintenance of herself and plaintiffs; the said F. F. Youngblood to loan and invest the same to best advantage, and pay the interest over to her annually." After a careful consideration of the evidence set forth in the transcript, we have reached the conclusion that the chancellor's findings on the facts are correct. Certainly it cannot be said that they are clearly against the preponderance of the evidence. This being true, the following principle of law is applicable: 14 Am. & Eng. Enc. Law (2d Ed.) 1026, and authorities cited in note, — especially Green v. Tulane, 52 N. J. Eq. 169, 28 Atl. 9. The doctrine announced in Nolen v. Harden, 43 Ark. 307, applies here. The transaction here described by the proof constitutes a gift inter vivos. See 1 Craw. Dig. p. 887, tit. "Gift," for cases showing prerequisites for such gifts. Affirm.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Candee v. Conn. Sav. Bank
...52 N. J. Eq. 169, 28 Atl. 9; Hope v. Hutchins, 9 Gill & J. (Md.) 77; O'Neil v. Greenwood, 106 Mich. 572, 64 N. W. 511; Smith v. Youngblood. 68 Ark, 255, 58 S. W. 42. It is claimed that there was not a complete delivery of the money deposited in the bank. It is not necessary that there shoul......
- Smith v. Youngblood