Smolyar v. Krongauz

Decision Date08 December 2003
Docket Number2002-09724.
Citation2003 NY Slip Op 19298,2 A.D.3d 518,767 N.Y.S.2d 873
PartiesYEFIM SMOLYAR, Appellant, v. MIKHAIL KRONGAUZ, Defendant, and JOSEF ROTTENSTEIN, Respondent. (And a Related Action.)
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the order dated March 7, 2001, is vacated, upon reargument, the branch of the motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the first cause of action insofar as asserted against the defendant Josef Rottenstein is denied, and the first cause of action is reinstated against the defendant Josef Rottenstein.

To be entitled to summary judgment, the defendant Josef Rottenstein was required to establish, prima facie, that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). Rottenstein failed to meet that burden. Indeed, his medical experts failed entirely to address the plaintiff's allegation that he sustained compression fractures of the C5, C6, and C7 vertebral bodies (see Meyer v Gallardo, 260 AD2d 556 [1999]).

Altman, J.P., S. Miller, McGinity, Adams and Mastro, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT