Snell v. State
Decision Date | 06 December 1890 |
Citation | 15 S.W. 722 |
Parties | SNELL v. STATE. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from district court, Greer county; G. A. BROWN, Judge.
This conviction was for manslaughter, under an indictment which charged the appellant with the murder of Joe B. Whitefield. The penalty assessed was a term of two years in the penitentiary. The proof shows that the deceased received the wounds, which terminated fatally, on Friday, May 23, 1890. On Saturday, May 24th, he made the statement in writing hereinafter set out as his dying declaration. He died on Saturday, June 1, 1890. The predicate upon which the statement was admitted in evidence as a dying declaration was established by the testimony of the state's witness Warren. Warren testified that he was with the deceased on the day preceding his death. Deceased's father and mother, Justice of the Peace Ice, and Mrs. Redding were present. Mrs. Redding, at the dictation of Squire Ice, wrote a complaint charging the defendant and his brother Sam and his father, S. W. Snell, with an assault with intent to murder deceased. The deceased signed and swore to that complaint before Squire Ice. Deceased's father then asked him if that complaint stated the truth. Deceased replied: At this time the deceased was sane, but was expecting to die, and had no hope of recovery. Justice of the Peace Fletcher testified for the state that on the day after the cutting of the deceased he called on the deceased to take his written statement. The deceased was then sane. He did not say that he expected to die, but that, as he did not know what might happen, he wanted to make his statement. What he said was not said in answer to interrogatories calculated to elicit any particular statement. The state then read the statement in evidence as the dying declaration of deceased. It reads as follows:
S. W. Snell, the father of the defendant, testified, in substance, for the defense, that a few minutes before the cutting he, from a distance of about 125 yards, saw the deceased strike or strike at the defendant across the fence. He went to that place at once, and told deceased that he wanted no difficulty there. Deceased said that the defendant had thrown down his gap. Witness said to him: "If you will ask Maggie Snell, Mrs. Stinson, and Miss Alma Thornton, you will find that Charlie did not throw down the gap." Deceased replied: "If the women threw it down, I have nothing more to say." He then turned to the defendant and Sam Snell, called them damned sons of bitches, and proposed to whip them both if they would cross the fence. Sam said to him, "I will show you that I am not afraid of you," and crawled through the fence into he lane. Before Sam straightened up, the deceased struck him. They clinched and fell, with the deceased underneath. Deceased and Sam then got up. Deceased ran at once for a club about 20 feet away. Defendant ran for the club at the same time. They met at the place where the club was lying, and deceased stooped to seize it. At this time Sam closed in upon the deceased. They clinched and fell, and at that instant the defendant got the club, and threw it over the fence. Witness was standing immediately behind the deceased when he, deceased, started for the club. He then saw no blood on nor rent in the deceased's shirt. As deceased rose from the ground after his second fall the witness saw that he was cut, and ordered Sam to stop, which Sam did. Deceased then started home. Witness, starting towards him, asked him, "Joe, are you hurt much?" He replied: "God damn you, don't you come about me!" Witness said to him: "I don't mean to hurt you, and I am very sorry this has happened." He then helped deceased to his house, put him to bed, and sent a boy for the doctor. The defendant, in his own behalf, testified substantially as did his father, and, in addition, that he ran for the club at the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Hamric
...246 Mo. 598, 152 S.W. 313, Ann.Cas.1914B 451; Johnson v. State, 125 Tenn. 420, 143 S.W. 1134, Ann.Cas.1913C 261; Sneall v. State, 29 Tex.App. 236, 15 S.W. 722, 25 Am.St.Rep. 723; Ross v. State, 10 Tex.App. 455, 38 Am.Rep. 643; People v. Forte, 269 Ill. 505, 110 N.E. 47, L.R.A.1916B 924; 13 ......
-
Ross v. Cooper
... ... 883, 19 N.E. 453; Britton v. Washington Water Power ... Co., 59 Wash. 440, 33 L.R.A. (N.S.) 109, 140 Am. St ... Rep. 858, 110 P. 20; State v. Deuble, 74 Iowa 509, ... 38 N.W. 383; Pittsburgh, C. C. & St. L. R. Co. v ... Haislup, 39 Ind.App. 394, 79 N.E. 1035; Waldele v ... New ... Cal. 72, 36 Am. Rep. 30; Mockabee v. Com. 78 Ky ... 380; Young v. Com. 6 Bush, 312; State v ... McEvoy, 9 S.C. 208; Snell v. State, 29 Tex.App ... 236, 25 Am. St. Rep. 723, 15 S.W. 722; Thurston v ... Fritz, 91 Kan. 468, 50 L.R.A. (N.S.) 1167, 138 P. 625; ... ...
-
Ross v. Cooper
...v. Commonwealth, 78 Ky. 380;Young v. Commonwealth, 6 Bush (Ky.) 312;State v. McEvoy, 9 Rich. (S. C.) 208;Snell v. State, 29 Tex. App. 236, 15 S. W. 722, 25 Am. St. Rep. 723. The former opinion of this court, handed down at the December, 1916, term, the writer of this opinion believes is not......
-
State v. Loon
... ... 437, 50 P. 686; People v ... Ramirez, 73 Cal. 403, 15 P. 33; Wharton's Homicide, ... sec. 621; People v. Farmer, 77 Cal. 1, 18 P. 800; ... State v. Wilmbusse, 8 Idaho 608, 70 P. 849; ... State v. Yee Wee, 7 Idaho 188, 61 P. 588; People ... v. Bemmerly, 87 Cal. 117, 25 P. 266; Snell v. State, 29 ... Tex. App. 236, 25 Am. St. 723, 15 S.W. 722.) ... It ... clearly appears that the deceased had no hope of recovery, ... and that the proper foundation was laid for the introduction ... of the dying declaration. ( People v. Crews, 102 Cal ... 174, 36 P. 367; ... ...