Snow v. Pressey
Decision Date | 28 May 1890 |
Citation | 82 Me. 552,20 A. 78 |
Parties | SNOW v. PRESSEY. |
Court | Maine Supreme Court |
(Official.)
Appeal from supreme judicial court, Knox county.
An appeal by defendant from a decree in favor of plaintiff after hearing on bill, answer, and proofs.
This was a bill in equity to redeem a mortgage. At the hearing at nisi prius the presiding justice ordered the bill to be sustained, and that the defendant account, etc.
The defendant contended that he held the premises under an absolute deed, and that his agreement to reconvey them to the plaintiff did not render the transaction a mortgage.
The bill alleged "that this conveyance and deed of quitclaim to the defendant, appearing on its face to be absolute, and with a separate instrument of defeasance, which the complainant here in court will produce, and which was then and there executed and delivered by the said Andrew Pressey to your complainant as part of the same transaction, constituted a mortgage. "
It appeared that on August 16, 1878, the plaintiff quitclaimed the premises, then subject to a mortgage given by him March 3, 1874, to the defendant and one Candee, his partner, to this defendant, who on the same day executed to the plaintiff the following instrument:
Candee's interest in the mortgage of March 3, 1874, was assigned and transferred May 1, 1884, to the defendant; and it was admitted by the parties that on August 16, 1878, there was a breach of the condition of this mortgage.
The plaintiff in his bill also alleged "that the said defendant, at said Rockland, during said year of 1878, but the precise date is to him unknown, entered into said land and premises and took possession of an undivided portion thereof, viz., one limekiln, a portion of the lime-sheds, and other buildings, structures, and wharves, by the consent of the complainant, and as the result of an agreement and understanding between them, and has remained in possession thereof. * * *"
The defendant claimed, on the other hand, that he took possession of the premises under the mortgage of March 3, 1874, for the purpose of foreclosure, and put in evidence the following certificate, which he claimed was a full compliance with Rev. St., c. 90, §3, cl. 3:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Donovan v. Boeck
... ... Jones, 92 Cal. 80; Booth v ... Hoskins, 75 Cal. 271; Kelly v. Leachman, 2 ... Idaho 1112; Hawes v. Williams, 92 Me. 483; Snow ... v. Pressey, 82 Me. 552; Security Sav., Etc., Co. v ... Lowenberg, 38 Ore. 159. (a) One of the indications that ... the transaction was ... ...
-
Wells v. Geyer
...to be a mortgage. Clark v. Landon, 90 Mich. 83, 51 N.W. 357; Watkins v. Williams, 31 S.E. 388; Kelly v. Leachman, 29 P. 849; Snow v. Pressey, 82 Me. 522, 20 A. 78; Jones Mortgages, 5th Ed. 244; Gunn's Appeal, 10 A. 498; Weisham v. Hocker, 54 P. 464; Frey v. Campbell, 3 S.W. 368. When the ev......
-
Beindorf v. Thorpe
...City, 19 N.M. 285, 142 P. 929; Preschbaker v. Feaman, 32 Ill. 475; Spicer v. Holbrook (Ky.) 23 Ky. L. Rep. 1812, 66 S.W. 180; Snow v. Pressey, 82 Me. 552, 20 A. 78; Clark v. Lannon, 90 Mich. 83, 51 N.W. 357; Sowles v. Butler (Vt.) 71 Vt. 271, 44 A. 355; Marshall v. Stewart et al., 17 Ohio 3......
-
Beindorf v. Thorpe
... ... 285, 142 P. 929, L. R. A. 1915A, ... 1106; Preschbaker v. Feaman, 32 Ill. 475; Spicer ... v. Holbrook (Ky.) 66 S.W. 180; Snow v. Pressey, ... 82 Me. 552, 20 A. 78; Clark v. Landon, 90 Mich. 83, ... 51 N.W. 359; Sowles v. Butler, 71 Vt. 271, 44 A ... 355; Marshall v ... ...