Snyder v. Hopkins
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | HOLMES |
| Citation | Snyder v. Hopkins, 39 Mo. 418 (Mo. 1867) |
| Decision Date | 31 January 1867 |
| Parties | JOSEPH E. SNYDER AND THERESA SNYDER, Plaintiffs in Error, v. CHARLES G. HOPKINS, Defendant in Error. |
Error to Kansas City Common Pleas Court.
M. D. Trefen, for plaintiffs in error.
J. Browne Hovey, for defendant in error.
In this case, the attorneys of the parties file an agreement to submit the case upon the record, without assignment of errors, joinder in error, or briefs. This kind of practice cannot be allowed. We discover no error in the judgment of the court below.
Judgment affirmed.
The other judges concur.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
10 cases
-
Flannery v. Kansas City
...as a record, that which, by law, cannot be. They cannot, even by agreement, dispense with briefs and assignments of errors. Snyder v. Hopkins, 39 Mo. 418; Dissee v. Frank, 52 Mo. 551. We cannot try a sham case because parties agree we may. I deem the decision in this cause contrary to the d......
-
Flannery v. Kansas City, St. J. & C.B. Ry. Co.
... ... Commissoners, 21 Kan. 484; ... Railroad v. McCandliss, 33 Kan. 366. They ... were evasive and will not support a general verdict ... Hopkins v. Stanley, 43 Ind. 553 ... IV. The ... motion for judgment on the special findings in ... defendant's favor should have been ... law, cannot be. They cannot, even by agreement, dispense with ... briefs and assignments of errors. Snyder" v. Hopkins, ... 39 Mo. 418; Dissee v. Frank, 52 Mo. 551 ... We ... cannot try a sham case because parties agree we may ... \xC2" ... ...
-
Roberts v. Hogan
...work of the appellate courts. Wade v. Bankers' Life Association, 145 Mo. App. 172, 129 S. W. 1004; Disse v. Frank, 52 Mo. 551; Snyder v. Hopkins, 39 Mo. 418; State v. Tope, 19 Mo. App. 273; Woodward v. Hodge. 24 Mo. App. It has also been held that failure to file a clear and concise stateme......
-
Owens v. Sinklear
... ... Sylvester, 99 Mo. 276; Flannery v. Railroad, 97 ... Mo. 192; Hyatt v. Wolfe, 22 Mo.App. 462; Disse ... v. Frank, 52 Mo. 551; Snyder v. Hopkins, 39 Mo ... 418. (2) The appellants, in their separate answer, raised the ... issue of ademption or satisfaction of the devise of one ... ...
Get Started for Free