Sobin v. M. Frisch & Sons
| Decision Date | 24 February 1970 |
| Citation | Sobin v. M. Frisch & Sons, 262 A.2d 702, 55 N.J. 448 (N.J. 1970) |
| Parties | John SOBIN, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. M. FRISCH & SONS, Defendant, and Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation, Defendant-Petitioner. |
| Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
On petition for certification to Appellate Division, Superior Court.
See same case below: 108 N.J.Super. 99, 260 A.2d 228.
Morgan, Melhuish, Monaghan, McCoid & Spielvogel, Newark, and John I. Lisowski, Jersey City, for petitioner.
Mandel, Wysoker, Sherman, Glassner, Weingartner & Feingold and Ronald S. Levitt, Perth Amboy, for respondents.
Denied.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
8 cases
-
Jones v. Jones
...action." Id. at 113, 207 A.2d 513. In Sobin v. M. Frisch & Sons, 108 N.J.Super. 99, 260 A.2d 228 (App.Div.1969), certif. den. 55 N.J. 448, 262 A.2d 702 (1970), we addressed the question whether the plaintiff's extended period of unconsciousness and semi-consciousness allegedly resulting fro......
-
Unkert by Unkert v. General Motors Corp.
...action against GM. In a similar case, Sobin v. M. Frisch & Sons, 108 N.J.Super. 99, 260 A.2d 228 (App.Div.1969), certif. denied, 55 N.J. 448, 262 A.2d 702 (1970), we held that the simultaneous occurrence of injury and unconsciousness, which persisted for 100 days, fell within section 21's t......
-
Rodriguez v. City of Passaic
...as interpreted and extended in Sobin v. M. Frisch and Sons, 108 N.J.Super. 99, 260 A.2d 228 (App.Div.1969), certif. denied, 55 N.J. 448, 262 A.2d 702 (1970), that plaintiff was insane under N.J.S.A. 2A:14-21 or that he was insane for the lengthy period of time during which the statute must ......
-
In re Bernheim Litigation
...to pursue his lawful rights." Sobin v. M. Frisch & Sons, 108 N.J.Super. 99, 104, 260 A.2d 228 (App.Div.1969), certif. denied, 55 N.J. 448, 262 A.2d 702 (1970). The Todish decision is particularly instructive. In that case, the plaintiff had a history of mental difficulties and had been cons......
Get Started for Free