Sobin v. Tylutki

Decision Date24 February 2009
Docket Number2007-06559.,2008-02039.
Citation873 N.Y.S.2d 743,2009 NY Slip Op 01465,59 A.D.3d 701
PartiesJESSICA A. SOBIN, Appellant, v. RAFAL TYLUTKI et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Ordered that the first order dated June 26, 2007 is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated November 16, 2007 is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondents Rafal Tylutki and Dariusz Lipinski.

This action arises from a chain-reaction motor vehicle accident which occurred on March 21, 2005 on Eliot Avenue, near its intersection with 74th Street in Queens. A motor vehicle operated by the defendant Rafal Tylutki and owned by the defendant Dariusz Lipinski struck the rear of a vehicle operated by the defendant Allen Luna, propelling it into a vehicle operated by the defendant Frederick Vennera, which, in turn, was propelled into a motor vehicle operated by the plaintiff. According to Luna's undisputed testimony, he had been stopped at a red light at the intersection of Eliot Avenue and 74th Street for approximately 45 seconds when the impact to his car occurred.

The evidence which Luna submitted in support of his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him established, prima facie, that he was not liable for the impact to the plaintiff's motor vehicle (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]; Arias v Rosario, 52 AD3d 551 [2008]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a...

To continue reading

Request your trial
31 cases
  • Singh v. Avis Rent, Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 16 d3 Julho d3 2014
    ...43 A.D.3d at 437, 840 N.Y.S.2d 817;see Okumus v. Living Room Steak House, Inc., 112 A.D.3d at 799, 977 N.Y.S.2d 340;Sobin v. Tylutki, 59 A.D.3d 701, 702, 873 N.Y.S.2d 743;Renna v. Gullo, 19 A.D.3d 472, 473, 797 N.Y.S.2d 115). The Supreme Court correctly determined that the defendants, in su......
  • Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Mone
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 1 d3 Julho d3 2020
    ...chance freely given to parties who have not exercised due diligence in making their first factual presentation’ " ( Sobin v. Tylutki, 59 A.D.3d 701, 702, 873 N.Y.S.2d 743, quoting Renna v. Gullo, 19 A.D.3d 472, 473, 797 N.Y.S.2d 115 [internal quotation marks omitted] ). Here, the plaintiff ......
  • Okumus v. Living Room Steak House, Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 18 d3 Dezembro d3 2013
    ...in making their first factual presentation” (Worrell v. Parkway Estates, 43 A.D.3d at 437, 840 N.Y.S.2d 817; see Sobin v. Tylutki, 59 A.D.3d 701, 702, 873 N.Y.S.2d 743; Renna v. Gullo, 19 A.D.3d 472, 473, 797 N.Y.S.2d 115). Here, the facts set forth in support of renewal were available to t......
  • Carmike Holding I, LLC v. Smith, 2017-03188
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 13 d4 Fevereiro d4 2020
    ...A.D.3d at 437, 840 N.Y.S.2d 817 ; see Okumus v. Living Room Steak House, Inc., 112 A.D.3d at 799, 977 N.Y.S.2d 340 ; Sobin v. Tylutki, 59 A.D.3d 701, 702, 873 N.Y.S.2d 743 ; Renna v. Gullo, 19 A.D.3d 472, 473, 797 N.Y.S.2d 115 ). Here, the defendant failed to establish that the alleged new ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT