Socop-Gonzalez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, SOCOP-GONZALE
| Decision Date | 29 September 2000 |
| Docket Number | P,SOCOP-GONZALE,No. 98-70782,98-70782 |
| Parties | (9th Cir. 2000) OSCARetitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. Filed |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Before: HUG, Chief Judge.
Prior Report: 208 F.3d 838
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
Note:
1. Judge Fisher was recused.
To continue reading
Request your trial
5 cases
-
Pierre v. PROVIDENCE WASH INS.
... ... and nonresident owner of the tractor by alternate service. Both default. Plaintiff then sues the named insured within ... ...
-
Lenis v. U.S. Atty. Gen.
...over a BIA decision under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a). See Socop-Gonzalez v. I.N.S., 208 F.3d 838, 844 (9th Cir.), vacated by 229 F.3d 860 (9th Cir.2000). But this decision was vacated and when heard en banc, the court did not address the issue. See Socop-Gonzalez v. I.N.S., 272 F.3d 1176, 1183 (9......
-
Ekimian v. I.N.S.
...under § 3.2(a) is subject to judicial review. Cf. Socop Gonzalez v. INS, 208 F.3d 838 (so holding), vacated by 229 F.3d 860 (9th Cir.2000) (ordering rehearing en banc). In Wang v. Ashcroft, 260 F.3d 448 (5th Cir.2001), the Fifth Circuit noted but failed to reach the question of reviewabilit......
- Kuyper v. Astrue
Request a trial to view additional results