Soileau v. State, 25434

Decision Date31 October 1951
Docket NumberNo. 25434,25434
Citation244 S.W.2d 224,156 Tex.Crim. 544
PartiesSOILEAU v. STATE.
CourtTexas Court of Criminal Appeals

John E. Cahoon, Houston and King C. Haynie, Houston (on appeal only), for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State's Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

Unlawfully carrying a pistol is the offense; the punishment, one year in jail.

Patrolmen of the city of Houston, while patrolling the streets of said city, about 3:30 o'clock, a. m., saw appellant in his automobile drive through a red light upon a street of said city. They pursued and arrested appellant for the traffic violation. After his arrest, a search of the person of appellant revealed that he was carrying a pistol on his person.

Appellant did not testify as a witness in his own behalf, nor did he present any affirmative defensive testimony.

The contention here is that appellant was unlawfully arrested by the patrolmen and that the search of his person was unauthorized.

Under the provisions of the Uniform Act Regulating Traffic on the Highways, Art. 6701d, Vernon's Ann.Civ.St. it is a violation of state law for one to 'disobey the instruction of any official traffic-control device placed in accordance with the provisions' of the act, Sec. 32. Also, the legislature has conferred upon the State Highway Commission the authority to place traffic-control devices 'upon all state highways', Sec. 30, and has conferred such control upon local authorities (cities) over public highways in their jurisdiction, Sec. 31. The right to arrest without warrant any person violating any provisions of the act is accorded by Sec. 153.

Appellant recognizes the foregoing provisions but insists that inasmuch as there is no showing here that the traffic-control device mentioned (red light) was not shown to have been erected, maintained, or controlled by the city of Houston or the Highway Commission, the state has not shown appellant guilty of the traffic violation or of running a red light.

We are not here dealing with the question of whether appellant was in fact guilty of such violation; all the requirement necessary for the officers to make the arrest was the existence of probable cause authorizing the belief that the traffic offense had been committed. According to the undisputed testimony, the patrolmen were authorized to so conclude and therefore to make the arrest.

It is now deemed axiomatic that a lawful arrest carries with it the right to search the person of the accused.

Believing the testimony as to the finding of the pistol upon appellant's person was admissible, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.

On Motion for Rehearing.

MORRISON, Judge.

...

To continue reading

Request your trial
25 cases
  • State v. Curtis, 42283
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Minnesota (US)
    • 9 July 1971
    ...right without a warrant to search the automobile he was driving. Brown v. State, 159 Tex.Cr.R. 306, 263 S.W.2d 261; Soileau v. State, 156 Tex.Cr.R. 544, 244 S.W.2d 224; Richardson v. State, 163 Tex.Cr.R. 585, 294 S.W.2d 844. 'The arrest being lawful, the search of the car was also lawful.' ......
  • Angel v. State
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
    • 7 October 1987
    ...conclude that an offense is being committed. Drago v. State, 553 S.W.2d 375, 377 (Tex.Cr.App.1977) (citing Soileau v. State, 156 Tex.Cr.R. 544, 244 S.W.2d 224, 225 (1951), aff'd. on reh'g, 244 S.W.2d 225).12 The State argues that Officer Toombs had independent authority under Article 18.16,......
  • State v. Mazuca
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
    • 12 September 2012
    ...v. State, 557 S.W.2d 83, 87 (Tex.Cr.App.1977); Drago v. State, 557 [553] S.W.2d 375, 377 (Tex.Cr.App.1977); and Soileau v. State, 156 Tex.Cr.R. 544, 244 S.W.2d 224, 226 (1970). The opinions in each of those cases clearly reveal that there was some evidence of an initial legitimate traffic s......
  • Wallace v. State
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
    • 17 February 1971
    ...traffic arrest and the admissibility of evidence of contraband or a pistol found during the course of such search. See Soileau v. State, 156 Tex.Cr.R. 544, 244 S.W.2d 224; Minor v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 219 S.W.2d 467; Brown v. State, 159 Tex.Cr.R. 306, 263 S.W.2d 261; Lane v. State, Tex.Cr.A......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT