Sola v. Sunny Slope Farms

Decision Date10 March 1964
Docket NumberNo. 18180,18180
Citation135 S.E.2d 321,244 S.C. 6
CourtSouth Carolina Supreme Court
PartiesDelia A. SOLA, Administratrix of the Estate of Fernando Sola, Carlos Fernando Sola and Jose Albert Sola, Respondents, v. SUNNY SLOPE FARMS and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, Appellants.

A. Ray Godshall, Gaffney, Thomas W. Whiteside, Spartanburg, for appellants.

Simpson Hyatt, Spartanburg, Reynolds & Larotonda, Coral Gables, Fla., for respondents.

MOSS, Justice:

Carlos Fernando Sola and Jose Albert Sola, the respondents herein, who are dependent children of Fernando Sola, filed with the South Carolina Industrial Commission a claim for benefits under the Workmen's Compensation Law, Section 72-1 et seq., Code of 1962, asserting that his death resulted from an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment with Sunny Slope Farms. The employer admitted that it was subject to and bound by the terms of the Act but denied that the employee sustained an injury, resulting in his death, by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment. The Hearing Commissioner found that Fernando Sola lost his life when struck by a Southern Railway train on June 5, 1961, and that such accident arose out of and in the course of his employment and awarded compensation therefor. The employer and its insurance carrier made timely application for a review of this award before the Full Commission. The order of the Single Commissioner was affirmed by a majority of the Full Commission. Thereafter, an appeal was duly taken by the employer, and its insurance carrier, to the Court of Common Pleas for Cherokee County, South Carolina. This appeal was heard by the Honorable Bruce Littlejohn, Resident Judge of the Seventh Circuit, who, on October 3, 1963, issued his order affirming the decision and award of the commission. Timely appeal to this Court followed. The single exception of the employer and carrier, the appellants herein, raises the question of whether the death of Fernando Sola was the result of an accident which arose out of or in the course of his employment.

We have held in numerous cases that the burden is upon the claimants to prove such facts as will render the injury and ensuing death compensable within the provisions of the Workmen's Compensation Act, and such award must not be based on surmise, conjecture or speculation. Gosnell v. Bryant, 240 S.C. 215, 125 S.E.2d 405. We have, likewise, held that it is the exclusive function of the Industrial Commission to settle questions of fact. The limit of the inquiry which the Circuit Court and this Court is permitted to make is whether there is any evidence reasonably tending to support the conclusions of the commission. It follows that this Court, and also the Circuit Court, may reverse an award if there is an absence of evidence to support it. Fowler v. Abbott Motor Co., 236 S.C. 226, 113 S.E.2d 737.

A death arises in the course of employment within the meaning of the Workmen's Compensation Act when it occurs within the period of employment at a place where the employee reasonably may be in the performance of his duties, and while he is fulfilling those duties or engaged in doing something incidental thereto. An accident arises out of the employment when it arises because of it as when the employment is a contributing proximate cause. These conditions must concur before the Act can apply. Portee v. South Carolina State Hospital, 234 S.C. 50, 106 S.E.2d 670.

Sunny Slope Farms is engaged in the business of producing and marketing peaches. It owns a farm on which the peaches are produced and has a packing shed located on a railroad siding near Gaffney, South Carolina, and some distance from the farm where the peaches are produced.

Fernando Sola, the deceased employee, was employed by Sunny Slope Farms as a carpenter, bookkeeper and packing shed worker and received as a salary therefor $50.00 per week. He lived in a labor camp maintained on the farm of his employer. The employee, on the day of his death, reported to the packing shed at 7:00 A.M. and worked until 6:00 P.M. and shortly after leaving the peach packing shed and while crossing the tracks of the Southern Railway, the automobile in which he was riding was struck by a train, resulting in his death. The automobile in which the deceased was riding was not furnished by his employer but belonged to one Aponte, the father-in-law of the deceased. The reason the deceased was using such automobile was because his own automobile was disabled.

The testimony shows that a labor camp was maintained on the premises of Sunny Slope Farms and that during the peach season some one hundred and fifty Puerto Ricans where housed and fed in this camp and each paid therefor the sum of $12.00 per week. Frank Trapaka, an employee of Sunny Slope Farms, operated the labor camp, and one Charlie Aponte was the camp manager. Trapaka testified that Sola did carpenter work in the repair of ladders at the camp. In addition thereto, in the absence of Trapaka and Aponte, Sola was superior to the laborers housed in the camp and assisted in keeping order and breaking up fights among the Puerto Ricans. Trapaka explains that in connection with keeping order, that Sola just helped him because he was a good friend. Trapaka also testified that the labor camp buildings belonged to Sunny Slope Farms but the operation of the camp was a private business. He admitted that the repair of ladders and the keeping of the payroll records at the farm was a part of the business of Sola's employer. He denied, however, that Sola had any duties to perform at the camp after he had finished his work on June 5, 1961, at the packing shed. He asserted that the payroll book work was done by Sola on Wednesday, Thursday and Friday nights of the week rather than on Monday nights, this being the day on which Sola lost his life.

Charlie Aponte, the father-in-law of the deceased, testified that Sola worked as a carpenter in the daytime and then every night in the labor camp he was keeping the payroll records of the laborers. He said that Sola would work in the packing shed in the daytime as a carpenter and at suppertime he would come to the camp and, after his meal, either Trapaka or the five or six foremen would give 'the times of the workers' to Sola, and such would be entered by him upon the payroll records. In addition to the $50.00 per week paid Sola for his services Aponte testified that he received 'room and board free' in the camp. This witness further stated that Sola worked by the week and at any time during the day or night that Sunny Slope Farms needed him, and that he knew of times late at night when Sola was called out to work. He stated that in his absence Sola 'would stay in the camp and do my duty, go buy groceries and clean the camp and everything.' He further testified that Sola assisted him in taking care of the order in the camp, and this was done with the approval of Louis Caggiano, who was the secretary and treasurer of Sunny Slope Farms. Aponte described Sola's duties, with reference to the keeping of the laborers' time, by saying, 'When he come to supper, he beginning to work on the time of the day books and then he pass to the big book.' He further described Sola's duties as being that of a carpenter in the daytime and then in the evening he was...

To continue reading

Request your trial
28 cases
  • Houston v. Deloach & Deloach
    • United States
    • South Carolina Court of Appeals
    • June 10, 2008
    ... ... Champion Laboratories, 330 S.C. 8, 11, 496 S.E.2d 856, 857 (1998); Sola" v. Sunny Slope Farms, 244 S.C. 6, 10, 135 S.E.2d 321, 324 (1964) ...   \xC2" ... ...
  • Aughtry v. Abbeville County Sch. Dist.
    • United States
    • South Carolina Court of Appeals
    • August 13, 1998
    ... ... & Gas Co., 259 S.C. 463, 192 S.E.2d 866 (1972) ; Sola v. Sunny Slope Farms, 244 S.C. 6, 135 S.E.2d 321 (1964) ... ...
  • Davaut v. Univ. of S.C.
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • October 26, 2016
    ... ... any service growing out of and incidental to his employment." Sola v. Sunny Slope Farms , 244 S.C. 6, 14, 135 S.E.2d 321, 326 (1964) ... ...
  • Holman v. Bulldog Trucking Co.
    • United States
    • South Carolina Court of Appeals
    • September 15, 1992
    ... ... See Sola v. Sunny Slope Farms, 244 S.C. 6, 135 S.E.2d 321 (1964). We cannot shift ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT