Solliday v. Umbach, 18147
| Decision Date | 24 June 1957 |
| Docket Number | No. 18147,18147 |
| Citation | 135 Colo. 500,313 P.2d 1005 |
| Parties | A. L. SOLLIDAY, Plaintiff in Error, v. Paul H. UMBACH, Brookhaven Oil Company, a corporation, and Stanolind Oil and Gas Company, a corporation, Defendants in Error. |
| Court | Colorado Supreme Court |
Hodges, Silverstein, Hodges & Harrington, William V. Hodges, Joseph G. Hodges, Denver, for plaintiff in error.
Hannett, Hannett & Cornish, Albuquerque, N. M., Lowell White, Walter A. Steele, Denver, for defendant in error Paul H. Umbach.
Gorsuch, Kirgis, Campbell, Walker & Grover, Frederic L. Kirgis, Richard B. Harvey, Denver, for defendant in error Brookhaven Oil Co.
Robinson, Charlton & Schrepferman, Richard L. Schrepferman, Denver, for defendant in error Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. SUTTON, Justice.
This action is a companion case to Solliday v. District Court, No. 18148, Colo., 313 P.2d 1000. Reference is made to that case for the history of the litigation and the reason for this writ of error. We have held in No. 18148 that the rule to show cause there involved should be made absolute and a writ of prohibition issued to the District Court thereon. That proceeding is a determination of the issues in this action. Accordingly this writ of error is dismissed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Tulips Invs., LLC v. State ex rel. Suthers
... ... The trial court granted this motion, citing our decision in Solliday v. District Court, 135 Colo. 489, 313 P.2d 1000 (1957), for general subpoena enforcement ... ...
-
Colorado Mills, LLC v. Sunopta Grains & Foods Inc.
... ... See Solliday v. Dist. Court, 135 Colo. 489, 499, 313 P.2d 1000, 1005 (1957). Instead, such enforcement, if any, ... ...
-
Umbach, Application of
...above mentioned Colorado trial court, was nullified on jurisdictional grounds in Solliday v. District Court, supra, and Solliday v. Umbach, 135 Colo. 500, 313 P.2d 1005, Umbach, hereinafter referred to as applicant, applied to the District Court within and for Tulsa County, Oklahoma, for an......
-
Solliday v. District Court In and For City and County of Denver, 18148
...the District Court action, also proceeded in a separate action, Solliday v. Umbach, No. 18147, to sue out a writ of error in this court, 313 P.2d 1005, his attorneys stating they could not determine the precise procedure to be followed, this being a case of first In support of his petition ......