Soloman v. Taylor
| Decision Date | 19 January 2012 |
| Parties | Robin SOLOMAN, Appellant, v. Barbara TAYLOR et al., Respondents. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 00285
91 A.D.3d 1180
937 N.Y.S.2d 408
Robin SOLOMAN, Appellant,
v.
Barbara TAYLOR et al., Respondents.
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jan. 19, 2012.
[937 N.Y.S.2d 408]
Leonard & Cummings, L.L.P., Binghamton (Hugh B. Leonard of counsel), for appellant.
Costello, Cooney & Fearon, P.L.L.C., Syracuse (James Gascon of counsel), for respondents.
Before: MERCURE, Acting P.J., LAHTINEN, SPAIN, MALONE JR. and KAVANAGH, JJ.
LAHTINEN, J.
[91 A.D.3d 1180] Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Cerio, J.), entered November 5, 2010 in Madison County, which granted defendants' motion for, among other things, summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
[91 A.D.3d 1181] In the summer of 2008, plaintiff and another individual were riding their horses on defendants' property when two dogs belonging to defendant Barbara Taylor startled the horses. Plaintiff's horse twisted, causing her to fall and sustain injuries. She commenced this action alleging, among other things, that defendants were negligent in permitting dogs to run free on property where horseback riding occurred.
Following disclosure, defendants moved for summary judgment dismissing the action upon the ground that plaintiff's mishap was an assumed risk of recreational horseback riding. Supreme Court granted defendants' motion. Plaintiff appeals.
“As a general rule, participants in a sporting event or activity may be held to have consented to those injury-causing events which are known, apparent or reasonably foreseeable” ( Rubenstein v. Woodstock Riding Club, 208 A.D.2d 1160, 1160, 617 N.Y.S.2d 603 [1994] [citation omitted] ). “[A]n inherent risk in sporting events involving horses is injury due to the sudden and unintended actions of the animals, ... [including] being thrown or falling” ( Tilson v. Russo, 30 A.D.3d 856, 857, 818 N.Y.S.2d 311 [2006] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted] ). “The experience of the participant certainly is relevant in deciding whether he or she appreciated and, thus, voluntarily assumed the risks of the activity” ( Dalton v. Adirondack Saddle Tours, Inc., 40 A.D.3d 1169, 1171, 836 N.Y.S.2d 303 [2007] [citation omitted] ).
Plaintiff had horseback riding experience as a child and she started riding again in the fall of 2007. She purchased a horse, which she boarded at defendants' stable, and had taken riding lessons from Taylor one to three times per week from September 2007 through the spring of...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Filer v. Adams
...728, 730, 697 N.Y.S.2d 186 [1999];Roe v. Keane Stud Farm, 261 A.D.2d 800, 801, 690 N.Y.S.2d 336 [1999];contrast Soloman v. Taylor, 91 A.D.3d 1180, 1181, 937 N.Y.S.2d 408 [2012] [horseback riding plaintiff thrown from horse spooked by dogs on the defendant's property, where the plaintiff boa......
-
Fenty v. Seven Meadows Farms, Inc.
...inherent in the sport of horseback riding ( see Toro v. New York Racing Assn., Inc., 95 A.D.3d 999, 944 N.Y.S.2d 229;Soloman v. Taylor, 91 A.D.3d 1180, 937 N.Y.S.2d 408;Kirkland v. Hall, 38 A.D.3d 497, 832 N.Y.S.2d 232). Awareness of a risk is to be assessed against the background of the sk......
-
Stanhope v. Burke
... ... injury-causing events which are known, apparent or reasonably ... foreseeable" (Soloman v Taylor, 91 A.D.3d 1180, ... 1181 [3d Dept 2012] [internal quotation marks and citation ... omitted]; see Dalton v Adirondack Saddle Tours, ... ...
-
Cives Corp. v. Hunt Constr. Grp., Inc.
...however, because AASHA amended its motion and no longer seeks to recover plaintiff's retainage. Instead, AASHA now seeks to recover[91 A.D.3d 1180] only its markup, and Hunt's averment that it has not yet been paid the markup raises factual issues as to whether the condition precedent has b......