Sorban v. STERLING ENGINEERING CORPORATION
| Decision Date | 04 November 2003 |
| Citation | 835 A.2d 473,266 Conn. 925 |
| Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
| Parties | EMIL SORBAN v. STERLING ENGINEERING CORPORATION. |
John L. Bonee III, in support of the petition.
Anne Kelly Zovas, in opposition.
The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 79 Conn. App. 444 (AC 23146), is denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
64 cases
-
Dinino v. Fed. Express Corp.
...805 A.2d 168 (2002) ; see also Sorban v. Sterling Engineering Corp. , 79 Conn.App. 444, 457–58, 830 A.2d 372, cert. denied, 266 Conn. 925, 835 A.2d 473 (2003) (holding failure to teach employees proper safety procedure does not trigger substantial certainty exception). Our Supreme Court has......
-
Lucenti v. Laviero
...930, 934 A.2d 246 (2007), and Sorban v. Sterling Engineering Corp. , 79 Conn. App. 444, 445–47, 830 A.2d 372, cert. denied, 266 Conn. 925, 835 A.2d 473 (2003), to conclude that the "plaintiff does not raise a genuine issue of material fact as to the ‘requirement of a showing of the employer......
- Wolfork v. Yale Med. Grp.
-
Bauco v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., No. 375290 (Conn. Super. 3/3/2004)
...verdict on the same facts." Sorban v. Sterling Engineering Corp., 79 Conn.App. 444, 447-48, 830 A.2d 372, cert. denied, 266 Conn. 925, 835 A.2d 473 (2003). I The defendant claims that it is entitled to summary judgment because the plaintiffs breached the "concealment or fraud" condition of ......
Request a trial to view additional results