Sorensen v. Wood
Decision Date | 10 June 1932 |
Docket Number | 28107 |
Citation | 243 N.W. 82,123 Neb. 348 |
Parties | C. A. SORENSEN, APPELLANT, v. RICHARD F. WOOD ET AL., APPELLEES |
Court | Nebraska Supreme Court |
APPEAL from the district court for Lancaster county: LINCOLN FROST JUDGE. Reversed.
REVERSED.
Syllabus by the Court.
1. The Federal Radio Act (47 USCA § 81 et seq.) confers no privilege to broadcasting stations to publish defamatory utterances.
2. When one writes libelous words concerning another and reads them before the microphone, with the consent of the owner of the broadcasting station and such owner broadcasts those words, the reader and owner unite in the publication of a libel and may be joined as defendants in an action for damages.
3. An action to recover damages for the broadcasting of a defamatory writing is based on libel and not on negligence.
4. That a licensee of a radio broadcasting station is a common carrier within the meaning of the Interstate Commerce Act (49 USCA § 1 et seq.) is not available as a defense under the issues and evidence in this cause.
Appeal from District Court, Lancaster County; Frost, Judge.
Action by C. A. Sorensen against Richard F. Wood and the KFAB Broadcasting Company. Judgment was entered against the individual defendant for nominal damages and in favor of corporate defendant, and plaintiff appeals.
Reversed and remanded.
Perry, Van Pelt & Marti, for appellant.
Max V. Beghtol, Glen H. Foe, J. Lee Rankin and Fred C. Foster, contra.
Lawrence Vold, amicus curiae.
Heard before GOSS, C. J., ROSE, DEAN, DAY and PAINE, JJ., and HORTH, District Judge.
C. A. Sorensen, who was a candidate for reelection as attorney general, brough this action for $ 100,000 damages against Richard F. Wood, who was the speaker, and against KFAB Broadcasting Company, owner and operator of the station over which the speech was broadcast from Lincoln. The jury found in favor of plaintiff as against Wood, assessing damages at one dollar, and found in favor of defendant company. Judgment was entered on the verdict against Wood for one dollar, absolving the broadcasting company from liability and awarding it execution for its costs. Plaintiff appealed.
The petition charged that, about 6:30 p. m., on August 11, 1930, being the evening before the Nebraska primary election, certain false and libelous statements, concerning plaintiff, contained in an article composed and broadcast by Wood, were published and circulated to a large radio audience by means of machinery and equipment supplied by defendant company; that a copy of Wood's address was available for use of the company before its publication over the radio, that a representative of the company introduced and vouched for Wood, was present and heard him read the article and thereby adopted and published said statements; that in the course of reading and publishing said article and, with the intention of injuring plaintiff in his profession and reputation, and for the purpose of making his election to the office of attorney general more difficult, defendants did maliciously publish the following language:
To show other things contained in the article, together with their connection and innuendo, as alleged by plaintiff, we reproduce three other paragraphs of the petition:
Plaintiff negatived the truth of the foregoing statements and inferences against him, alleging their damaging effect upon him and his reputation and praying judgment against defendants and each of them.
The defendants answered separately. Wood admitted the corporate existence and description of the equipment, functions and nature of service of the company and generally denied the rest of the petition. The company made like admissions and denial, alleged a misjoinder of defendants, pleaded that it was a common carrier of intelligence by wire and wireless under the interstate commerce act, duly licensed and subject to the regulation of the federal radio commission; pleaded general order No. 31 of the commission, dated May 11, 1928 providing that, in broadcasting material for candidates for public office, "such licensee shall have no power of censorship over the material," and that equal opportunities must be afforded legally qualified candidates for any public office in the use of such broadcasting station; that Wood was a candidate for railway commissioner. George W. Norris (then and now United States senator) and W. M. Stebbins were candidates for the Republican nomination for the office of United States senator; that Senator George W. Norris had been permitted to use the broadcasting station to promote his candidacy, and so on August 11, 1930, this defendant permitted W. M. Stebbins to do likewise, and Richard F. Wood was presented by Stebbins to speak on his behalf and was permitted to do so; that this defendant had no knowledge in advance of its utterance as to what the speech was to be except that it was to be a political speech in favor of Stebbins against Senator Norris, nor did this defendant or its agents hear that part of the speech alleged as slanderous, libelous and defamatory, nor did it have any power to censor the speech; that plaintiff had been furnished a copy of the speech in advance, knew its context, was possessed of full knowledge of Wood's intention to utter its words over the radio, gave no notice to either Wood or this defendant of any objection and so is estopped to claim damages; that said words were privileged and invited by plaintiff; that this defendant's first knowledge of any objection by plaintiff was not had until about 11 a. m. the next day, whereupon it announced over its broadcasting station four times that afternoon a statement fully set out in the answer, describing the situation and advising its...
To continue reading
Request your trial