Sorenson v. City Nat. Bank
Decision Date | 16 May 1932 |
Docket Number | No. 1557-5889.,1557-5889. |
Parties | SORENSON v. CITY NAT. BANK. |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
E. J. Hamner, of Sweetwater, for appellant.
T. Vard Woodruff, B. M. Neblett, and Douthit, Mays & Perkins, all of Sweetwater, for appellee.
This case is before us on certified questions from the Court of Civil Appeals for the Eleventh district at Eastland. The certificate is as follows:
Simply stated, the facts of this case are as follows:
On July 17, 1922, J. H. Wallace and wife resided in Sweetwater, Nolan county, Tex., where they owned and occupied a homestead which stood in the name of the husband. On the above date the dwelling house, and household goods therein contained, burned. The house and household goods were insured against loss by fire, the house for $1,250, and the contents for $500. William Wright held a vendor's lien against the home, and the insurance policy contained the usual loss payable clause in his favor. Settlement was made with the insurance company on the dwelling for $1,219.87, and on the contents for $500. The insurance company paid the loss by draft for the total sum of $1,719.87, payable to J. H. Wallace and William Wright. The draft was carried to the garnishee bank for the purpose of being cashed. J. H. Wallace and his wife, Mrs. J. H. Wallace, were present, as was also Judge Yantis, attorney for, and representing, William Wright. The draft was properly indorsed and cashed by the bank. Judge Yantis was paid the amount due Wright on his lien, and the balance of the money, $969.87, was passed to the credit of Mrs. J. H. Wallace. At the time this money was deposited to Mrs. Wallace's credit, both she and her husband were present, and the bank received instructions to so deposit the money, and further received instructions that it was deposited subject to Mrs. Wallace's exclusive control, and check. In other words, the testimony is conclusive that the money was deposited to the credit of the wife, in her name, and with the then instruction that it was subject to her exclusive control and check. The husband was present and legally acquiesced in and agreed to this.
On September 1, 1922, Sorenson filed suit in the justice's court, precinct No. 1, Nolan county, Tex., against J. H. Wallace on a sworn account amounting to $154.85. At the same time the suit was filed, and ancillary thereto, affidavit bond in garnishment was filed, and writ of garnishment was immediately...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Amarillo Nat. Bank v. Liston
...be attacked on the grounds it was made in fraud of creditors. Chandler v. Welborn, 156 Tex. 312, 294 S.W.2d 801; Sorenson v. City National Bank, 121 Tex. 478, 49 S.W .2d 718. See also 20 Tex.Jur.2d 389, Sec. 86. The securities and notes conveyed and pledged by Bonne Liston, being her separa......
-
United States v. Liverpool & London & Globe Ins. Co.
...Ann.Civ.St.), and the authorities thereunder. Rosenthal v. Frankfort Distillers Corp., 5 Cir., 193 F.2d 137; Sorenson v. City National Bank, 121 Tex. 478, 479, 49 S.W.2d 718; cf. 25 Tex.Jur., Sec. 11, page The judgment was right. It is Affirmed. RIVES, Circuit Judge (dissenting). On April 2......
-
Phillips v. Vitemb
...them does not of itself cause the aggregate to be separate but rather the contrary. Rippy v. Rippy, supra." Sorenson v. City National Bank, 121 Tex. 478, 49 S.W.2d 718; Teague v. Fairchild, Tex.Com.App., 15 S.W.2d 585, presenting circumstances of actual conduct and participation by the husb......
-
Robbins v. Robbins, 13864.
...her own. The intention to give may be shown by circumstances. Teague v. Fairchild, Tex.Com.App., 15 S. W.2d 585; Sorenson v. City Natl. Bank, 121 Tex. 478, 49 S.W.2d 718; 23 Tex. Jur., pp. 73 et In response to issues the jury found that defendant gave to plaintiff all her future earnings an......