South Florida Water Management Dist. v. Ratner
Decision Date | 18 April 1978 |
Docket Number | Nos. 77-479,77-488 and 77-511,s. 77-479 |
Citation | 357 So.2d 1055 |
Parties | SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, Florida Audubon Society and Tropical Audubon Society, Inc., Appellants, v. Nat RATNER, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Thomas J. Schwartz, Robert Grafton and Stephen A. Walker, West Palm Beach, Fleming & Neuman, Miami, for appellants.
Horton, Perse & Ginsberg, A. Jay Cristol and Steven Mishan, Miami, for appellee.
Before PEARSON, HUBBART and KEHOE, JJ.
These appeals are from a single order entitled "Amended Summary Judgment and Order on Motion for Summary Judgment." The appellants are the Central and Southern Florida Flood Control District, 1 the Tropical Audubon Society, Inc., and the Florida Audubon Society. The District was the defendant and the Societies were granted leave by the trial court to intervene as parties defendant. The result of the partial summary judgment appealed is that the District must provide the appellee, plaintiff Nat Ratner, with a means of access to his lands. The operative portion of the order is as follows:
During the latter part of 1950 and January, 1951, the Central and Southern Flood Control District entered into certain easement agreements or flood contracts with Ratner's predecessors in title. At the time, the subject property had been platted. The easement agreements, prepared by the District, gave the District the right to construct, operate and maintain a project in the interest of flood control, reclamation and conservation on the lands owned in fee by the grantors. These Flood Easement Deeds provide that the District had the right, inter alia, to the:
The grantors retained substantial rights in and to their property which were enumerated in the documents:
"It is specifically understood and agreed that the foregoing grant of the uses, rights and privileges aforesaid shall in no wise prohibit or interfere with the right of the parties of the first part (the plaintiff's predecessors in interest), their heirs, administrators, assigns or lessees, to: (a) lease or conduct operations on the premises herein described, for the exploration or drilling for, or the developing, producing, storing, or removing of oil, gas or other minerals in or under the aforesaid premises, (b) remove topsoil, muck, etc., from the surface, (c) make such further use as will not conflict with the purposes for which this grant is given."
The foregoing provisions in each of the Easement Deeds are followed by the following reservation of rights to the grantor:
Beginning in 1952, the District under its rights granted in the easement agreements constructed a system of levees and borrow canals which virtually surrounded the Ratner land. Levee 30 and Borrow Canal 30 physically separate the Ratner land from other lands to the east and from Krome Avenue. Levee 30 has an average height of approximately thirteen feet above natural ground level and has a width of some seventy feet. The adjacent borrow canal is approximately eighty feet in width and twenty feet deep. The system of levees and canals in which the Ratner land is located is known as Conservation Area 3, which is divided into Areas 3A and...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Florida Audubon Soc. v. Ratner
...herein. We need not recite the underlying facts of the case as they were sufficiently set forth in South Florida Water Management District v. Ratner, 357 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 364 So.2d 891 (Fla.1978) (hereinafter Ratner I ). The case was remanded, with instructions for th......
- South Florida Water Management District v. Ratner