Southeastern Fidelity Ins. Co. v. Cole
| Decision Date | 04 September 1986 |
| Docket Number | No. 67226,67226 |
| Citation | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 456,493 So.2d 445 |
| Parties | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 456 SOUTHEASTERN FIDELITY INS. CO., Petitioner, v. Mark COLE, et al., Respondents. |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Susan Minor of Thompson and Associates, Ltd., Miami, for petitioner.
R. Fred Lewis of Magill and Lewis, P.A., Miami, for respondents.
We have for review Cole v. Southeastern Fidelity Insurance Co., 469 So.2d 925 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), which, at the time of its rendition, directly conflicted with many district court and Supreme Court decisions relating to priorities among insurance policies in automobile leasing situations. We take jurisdiction, article V, section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution.
Mark Cole leased a car from Holiday Rent-A-Car (Holiday), and was involved in an accident while driving the vehicle. State Farm Mutual Insurance Company (State Farm) insured Cole. Southeastern Fidelity Insurance Company (Southeastern) insured Holiday. Cole, a permissive user of the leased vehicle, was an additional insured under the Southeastern policy. Both the State Farm and Southeastern policies expressly provide that they are excess policies in regard to non-owned vehicles.
We must apply the law as set forth in Allstate Insurance Co. v. Fowler, 480 So.2d 1287 (Fla.1985); Metropolitan Property and Life Insurance Co. v. Chicago Insurance Co., 479 So.2d 114 (Fla.1985); and Maryland Casualty Co. v. Reliance Insurance Co., 478 So.2d 1068 (Fla.1985), to the facts of this case.
The insurer of the owner/lessor must provide the first $10,000 worth of coverage unless the owner/lessor has properly shifted the burden of primary insurance to the lessee pursuant to section 627.7263, Florida Statutes (1981). Fowler; Maryland Casualty Co.. Holiday failed to shift the burden of primary insurance to Cole. As a result Southeastern, Holiday's insurer, must provide the first $10,000 worth of coverage.
State Farm issued a policy directly to Cole and Southeastern insured Cole as an additional insured. Thus, policy language will control the determination of the next level of coverage because neither company is entitled to indemnity. See Fowler; Metropolitan Property. We fully recognize the provision in State Farm's policy which provides that it only furnishes excess coverage on non-owned vehicles. State Farm's insured, Cole, was driving a non-owned vehicle. Therefore, the Southeastern policy must be exhausted before the State Farm policy can be reached.
We reject Southeastern's argument that the following provision found on the back of the lease agreement between Holiday and Cole requires State Farm to provide the layer...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Allstate Ins. Co. v. RJT Enterprises, Inc.
...the lessee's insurance carrier when the lessee in fact has a primary liability insurance carrier." See also Southeastern Fidelity Ins. Co. v. Cole, 493 So.2d 445, 446 (Fla.1986); State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Lindo's Rent-A-Car, Inc., 588 So.2d 36, 37 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991); International ......
-
RJT Enterprises, Inc. v. Allstate Ins. Co.
...of the law, 2 regardless of any contrary contractual provisions in the lease or insurance policy. Southeastern Fidelity Ins. Co. v. Cole, 493 So.2d 445, 446 (Fla.1986); Allstate Ins. Co. v. Fowler, 480 So.2d 1287, 1289 (Fla.1985); Maryland Casualty Co. v. Reliance Ins. Co., 478 So.2d 1068 (......
-
Chrysler Credit Corp. v. United Services Auto. Ass'n
...into car rental agreement that purports to shift primary liability to the lessee's auto insurance carrier); Southeastern Fidelity Insur. Co. v. Cole, 493 So.2d 445 (Fla.1986). When Bruce Hagen assigned to H-K Leasing his rights to the liability insurance policy provided to him by U.S.A.A., ......
-
Snider v. Continental Ins. Co., 87-143
...a rental agreement provision cannot be relied on to establish the provisions of the insurance policy. Southeastern Fidelity Ins. Co. v. Cole, 493 So.2d 445, 447 (Fla.1986). It is the specific language of the policy, not the rental agreement, which controls the order of insurance payments. C......