Southern Home Ins. Co. v. Burdette's Leasing Service, Inc., 20419

Decision Date06 May 1977
Docket NumberNo. 20419,20419
Citation234 S.E.2d 870,268 S.C. 472
PartiesSOUTHERN HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent, v. BURDETTE'S LEASING SERVICE, INC., Appellant.
CourtSouth Carolina Supreme Court

Julius B. Aiken and George F. Townes, Greenville, for appellant.

John E. Johnston, Leatherwood, Walker, Todd & Mann, Greenville, for respondent.

LITTLEJOHN, Justice:

This appeal grows out of an order of Greenville County Court holding that the defendant, Burdette's Leasing Service, Inc., must reimburse the plaintiff, Southern Home Insurance Company, in the amount of $12,000. This amount represents a portion of a $42,000 settlement paid by Southern Home to George Ashmore, who was injured while Tommy Lee was driving one of Burdette's leased motor vehicles.

Burdette's owns more than 25 motor vehicles and is engaged in the business of renting them to the public. It rented a motor vehicle to Messrs. Griffin and Howard (lessees) for the use of their employee, Lee. At the time of the accident in which Lee injured Ashmore, Southern Home had in force its automobile liability insurance policy naming Griffin and Howard as insured and extending coverage to Lee. The policy contained the standard "other insurance" provision found in automobile liability insurance policies which provide in part as follows:

". . . (U)nder coverage A (bodily injury liability) and B (property damage liability) the insurance with respect to temporary substitute automobiles under Insuring Agreement IV or other automobiles under Insuring Agreement V shall be excess insurance over any other valid and collectible insurance."

Claim was made by Ashmore against Griffin and Howard and against Lee, for bodily injury and property damage arising out of the accident caused by the negligence and recklessness of Lee. Demand was made upon Burdette's (a self-insurer) to furnish a defense to Griffin and Howard and to Lee, and to pay any judgment up to $10,000 for personal injury and up to $5,000 for property damages. The demand was refused by Burdette's.

Southern Home entered a defense and settled Ashmore's claim by paying $40,000 for personal injury, plus $2,000 for property damages. It has been stipulated that the amount was reasonable and if Southern Home is entitled to any judgment against Burdette's, the amount should be $10,000 for personal injuries, plus $2,000 for property damages.

The South Carolina Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Act (§ 46-701, et seq., Code of Laws of South Carolina (1962)) provides the means by which a motor vehicle owner may prove his ability to respond to a judgment. This is usually accomplished by the procurement of a motor vehicle liability policy. The statute requires that the policy cover not only operation by the named insured, but also operation by ". . . any person who uses with the consent, express or implied, the motor vehicle to which the policy applies." Section 46-709 of the Code provides that owners of more than 25 vehicles may qualify as self-insurers. It reads as follows:

"46-709. Self-insurers. Any person in whose name more than twenty-five motor vehicles are registered may qualify as a self-insurer by obtaining a certificate of self-insurance issued by the Department as provided in this section. The Department may, in its discretion, upon the application of such person, issue a certificate of self-insurance when it is satisfied that the person is possessed and will continue to be possessed of ability to pay judgments obtained against him. Upon not less than five days' notice and a hearing pursuant to the notice the Department may upon reasonable grounds cancel a certificate of self-insurance. Failure to pay any judgment within thirty days after the judgment shall have become final shall constitute a reasonable ground for the cancellation of a certificate of self-insurance."

Burdette's qualified as a self-insurer under this Code provision and, accordingly, at the time of the accident there was no liability insurance policy covering the operation of the motor vehicle driven by Lee, with Burdette's as the named insured.

Burdette's attempted to minimize and/or avoid its responsibility under the Act by inserting in its lease agreement with Griffin and Howard a provision as follows:

"I will not hold Burdette's Leasing Service liable for any liability arising from the rental of this car."

and

"I fully understand that the car listed below is a replacement car and is covered by my insurance for the period of time of rental until this car is returned to the lessor."

The theory of Southern Home's case, as set out in its complaint, is that Burdette's as a self-insurer, is obligated to provide to the public the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
37 cases
  • National Farmers Union Property & Cas. Co. v. Bang
    • United States
    • South Dakota Supreme Court
    • May 18, 1994
    ...certificate of self-insurance was "policy" within meaning of statutory requirement that policy include UIM); Southern Home Ins. Co. v. Burdette, 268 S.C. 472, 234 S.E.2d 870 (1977); South Carolina Elec. and Gas Co. v. Jeter, 288 S.C. 432, 343 S.E.2d 47 (App.1986).4 We are aware of the split......
  • Passamano v. Travelers Indem. Co., RENT-A-CAR
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • October 11, 1994
    ...1331 (Okla.1988); Modesta v. Southeastern Pa. Transp. Auth., 503 Pa. 437, 469 A.2d 1019 (1983); Southern Home Ins. Co. v. Burdette's Leasing Serv., Inc., 268 S.C. 472, 234 S.E.2d 870 (1977). Other courts have concluded that self-insured lessors are empowered to reject uninsured motorist cov......
  • Original Blue Ribbon Taxi v. Sc Dmv
    • United States
    • South Carolina Court of Appeals
    • November 25, 2008
    ...are required to provide a substitute for an insurance policy to the extent of the statutory policy requirements. See Southern Home Ins., 268 S.C. at 477, 234 S.E.2d at 872. Blue Ribbon complied with the requirements established by Section 56-9-60(A) and provided a segregated claims account ......
  • Nelson v. Artley
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • June 17, 2014
    ...policy (McSorley v. Hertz Corp., 885 P.2d 1343, 1350 (Okla.1994) ; Southern Home Insurance Co. v. Burdette's Leasing Service, Inc., 268 S.C. 472, 234 S.E.2d 870, 872 (1977) ), another case only mentioned the extent of a self-insured's responsibility in the context of holding that a self-ins......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT