Southern Intern. Corp. v. Poly-Urethane Industries, Inc.

Decision Date27 December 1977
Docket NumberNo. 76-2050,POLY-URETHANE,76-2050
Citation353 So.2d 646
PartiesSOUTHERN INTERNATIONAL CORP., Appellant, v.INDUSTRIES, INC. and Foremost Insurance Co., Appellees.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Richard M. Welsh & Associates, Joe N. Unger, Miami, for appellant.

Wicker, Smith, Blomqvist, Davant, McMath, Tutan & O'Hara and Richard A. Sherman, Miami, for appellees.

Before HAVERFIELD, HUBBART and KEHOE, JJ.

KEHOE, Judge.

Appellant, plaintiff below, brings this appeal from a final judgment, entered on October 7, 1976, by the trial court sitting non-jury, determining that under a general liability insurance policy issued by appellee Foremost Insurance Company to appellee Poly-Urethane Industries, Inc., both defendants below, the claims made by appellant constituted one occurrence under the policy, thereby, limiting liability to $10,000. We agree with the trial court's determination; therefore, the final judgment appealed is affirmed.

This case arises out of a contract between appellant and appellee Poly-Urethane Industries, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Poly-Urethane), for the application of a poly-urethane sealant to the roofs of part of a condominium complex known as Palm West Gardens Condominium located at 1910, 1950, and 1990 West 56th Street, Hialeah, Florida, owned by appellant. Pursuant to the contract, appellee Poly-Urethane applied a sealing substance to the roofs of each of these buildings, completing the application around January of 1973. Several months later, various tenants of these buildings began experiencing leaks in the roofs. Appellee Poly-Urethane does not contest responsibility for the damage nor is it contested that the damages are covered by the policy of insurance issued by appellee Foremost Insurance Company.

The policy is a comprehensive general liability policy which provides coverage for bodily injury or property damage caused by the application of the sealant. For any such damage, it provides $10,000 coverage for "each occurrence" and $25,000 for the "aggregate." In the definition section of the policy, the term "occurrence" is defined as follows:

"For the purposes of determining the limit of the company's liability, all bodily injury and property damage arising out of continuous or repeated exposure to substantially the same general conditions, shall be considered as arising out of one occurrence."

During the course of the trial and by this appeal, appellant argues that, because several roofs were sealed pursuant to the contract, the leakage of each roof was a separate occurrence and, therefore, the aggregate coverage under the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 cases
  • Mid–continent Cas. Co. v. Basdeo
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Florida
    • September 27, 2010
    ...on Koikos v. Travelers Insurance Company, 849 So.2d 263, 269 (Fla.2003), and Southern International Corporation v. Poly–Urethane Industries, Inc., 353 So.2d 646 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977) (“ Poly–Urethane ”). The Koikos policy employed the same definition of “occurrence” as the Policy in this case,......
  • Appalachian Ins. Co. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • April 27, 1982
    ...to the separate claims of each class member, none of which exceeded $25,000.12 See note 8 supra. See Southern Int'l. Corp. v. Poly-Urethane Indus., Inc., 353 So.2d 646 (Fla.App.1977).13 See note 8 supra.14 This is not a case where an insured commits a tortious act and then after a lapse of ......
  • Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Columbia
    • November 21, 1984
    ...(contractor damaging several apartments by tracking paint on carpets single occurrence); Southern International Corp. v. Poly-Urethane Industries, Inc., 353 So.2d 646, 648 (Fla. Dist.Ct.App.1977) (contractors damaging several different condominiums while applying sealant to each roof single......
  • Transport Ins. Co. v. Lee Way Motor Freight
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Texas
    • April 24, 1980
    ...vinyl-covered paneling caused widespread damage to a variety of ultimate users — single occurrence); Southern Intl. Corp. v. Polyurethane Ind., Inc., 353 So.2d 646 (Fla. App.1977) (contractor damaged several different condominiums while applying sealant to each roof — single occurrence); Am......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT