Southern Oil Co. v. Church
| Decision Date | 10 June 1903 |
| Citation | 75 S.W. 817 |
| Parties | SOUTHERN OIL CO. v. CHURCH. |
| Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
The appellant, when it furnished to Hammil & Bro. the derrick, could by the exercise of ordinary care have known that it was defective, as stated in our original finding, and at the time knew that it would be used by the servants of Hammil & Bro. in drilling the well.Hammil & Bro. used the derrick in the ordinary and usual way in drilling the well, and the defective condition of the crown piece of the...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
11 cases
-
Davis Bakery Inc v. Dozier
...v. Lewman, 115 Ga. 752, 42 S. E. 98; Busby v. Anderson Water, Light & P. Co., 136 Fed. 156, 69 C. C. A. 154. See, also, Southern Oil Co. v. Church, 32 Tex. Civ. App. 325. 74 S. W. 797, 75 S. W. 817; Shearman & Redfield on Neg. § 175. In 26 Cyc. p. 1568, it is said: "The liability of the con......
-
Roosth & Genecov Production Co. v. White
... ... by the exercise of ordinary care, should have known' in the issue first above quoted, and is posed by the petitioner's contention that under Southern Oil Co. v. Church, 1903, 32 Tex.Civ.App. 325, 74 S.W. 797, 75 S.W. 817, writ of error refused, ... 'the petitioner here owed no duty to White' ... ...
-
Connors-Weyman Steel Co. v. Kilgore
... ... Co., 49 Mich. 164, 13 N.W. 499, 43 Am.Rep. 456; Douglass ... v. Marsh, 141 Mich. 209, 104 N.W. 624; So. Oil Co ... v. Church, 32 Tex.Civ.App. 325, 74 S.W. 797, 75 S.W ... 817; Stevens v. United Gas Co., 73 N.H. 159, 60 A ... 848, 70 L.R.A. 119. See, also, Sloss I. & S ... ...
-
Burton-Lingo Co. v. Armstrong
... ... Lone Star Const. Co., Inc., Tex.Civ.App., 109 S.W.2d 1021; Peyton Packing Co. v. Collis et al., Tex.Civ.App., 110 S.W.2d 625; Southern" Surety Co. of New York v. Scheel et al., 125 Tex. 1, 78 S.W.2d 173; Traders & General Ins. Co. v. Jones et al., Tex.Civ.App., 95 S.W.2d 189 ... \xC2" ... Southern Oil Co. v. Church, 32 Tex.Civ.App. 325, 74 S.W. 797, 75 S.W. 817, writ refused; Montgomery v. Garza, Tex.Civ.App., 290 S.W. 210; Ray v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co ... ...
Get Started for Free