Southern Pacific Transp. Co. v. Department of Revenue

Citation316 Or. 495,852 P.2d 197
PartiesSOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE and Douglas County, Klamath County, Lane County, and Linn County, Oregon, Respondents. OTC 3184; SC S39756.
Decision Date04 June 1993
CourtSupreme Court of Oregon

Thomas H. Nelson, of Stoel Rives Boley Jones & Grey, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.

Marilyn J. Harbur, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents. With her on the brief was Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., Salem.

PETERSON, Justice.

This appeal is from the Tax Court. The parties are the taxpayer-plaintiff, Southern Pacific Transportation Company (taxpayer), and five defendants, including the Department of Revenue and four Oregon counties. The only issue is whether a 1989 amendment to the property tax law requires taxpayer to pay a higher rate of interest on real property taxes unpaid as of July 1, 1989. The Tax Court ruled in favor of defendants. Southern Pacific Trans. Co. v. Dept. of Rev., 12 OTR 278 (1992). Taxpayer appealed. We affirm.

Taxpayer and defendants were involved in other litigation in the Tax Court involving the value of taxpayer's property in various Oregon counties for tax years 1980 through 1991. While that litigation was pending, the 1989 Legislative Assembly enacted House Bill 2338 (Or.Laws 1989, ch. 796), which included these provisions:

"SECTION 10. Notwithstanding ORS 311.505(2), the rate of interest as specified under ORS 311.505(2) shall be one and one-third percent per month, or fraction of a month.

" * * * * *

"SECTION 22. The increased interest rate provided by section 10 of this Act applies to interest charged and collected on property taxes that are unpaid for periods beginning on or after July 1, 1989, and prior to July 1, 1998. However, if taxes that are unpaid on July 1, 1989, are paid prior to the effective date of this Act [October 3, 1989], the interest charged and collected upon payment shall be charged and collected at the rate of one percent per month, or fraction of a month, from the due date as specified under ORS 311.505(1) to the date of payment." (Emphasis added.) 1

In 1991, the counties and taxpayer settled the valuation dispute. As a result of that settlement, taxpayer was obligated to pay additional taxes to the four counties involved in this case. Taxpayer and defendants disagreed as to the amount of interest due. The answer turns on the construction and application of the 1989 laws set forth above.

Taxpayer filed a declaratory judgment action in the Tax Court, asserting that the higher tax rate required by section 10 of the 1989 law, 16 percent, applies only to taxes that accrued after July 1, 1989. Defendants assert that the 16 percent rate applies to all taxes that were unpaid as of July 1, 1989. We agree with defendants.

Taxes become due and owing when assessed. See ORS 311.250; 308.210. Appeal of the property valuation on which the taxes are based does not alter the fact that the taxes have already been assessed and become delinquent if not paid by May 15 following assessment. ORS 311.510. An appeal merely stays collection action. ORS 305.565.

State v. Trenary, 316 Or. 172, 175, 850 P.2d 356 (1993), sets forth the template that we follow in construing statutes. We start with the text and context of the statute. In considering context, we "consider other provisions of the same statute and other statutes on the same subject." Ibid. We look to the legislative history if the text and context do not tell us what the legislature intended.

The text and context provide the answer in this case. Section 22 provides that the 16 percent interest rate "applies to * * * property taxes that are unpaid for periods beginning on or after July 1, 1989." Section 22 also contains a provision for a grace period during which "taxes that are unpaid on July 1, 1989, [can be] paid prior to the effective date of this Act [October 3, 1989]." (Emphasis added.) Payment of the unpaid tax during the grace...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • State v. Person
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • 17 Junio 1993
    ...to discern the legislature's intent by examination of both the text and the context of the statute. Southern Pacific Trans. Co. v. Dept. of Rev., 316 Or. 495, 852 P.2d 197 (1993) (slip op at 2, citing State v. Trenary, 316 Or 172, 175, 850 P2d 356 (1993)). The text of the statutory provisio......
  • Portland General Elec. Co. v. Bureau of Labor and Industries
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • 19 Octubre 1993
    ...both the text and context of the statute. State v. Person, supra, 316 Or. at 590, 853 P.2d 813; Southern Pacific Trans. Co. v. Dept. of Rev., 316 Or. 495, 498, 852 P.2d 197 (1993). That is the first level of our In this first level of analysis, the text of the statutory provision itself is ......
  • Home Builders Ass'n of Lane Cnty. v. City of Eugene, LUBA No. 2020-015
    • United States
    • Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals
    • 24 Noviembre 2020
    ...body that enacted the law). The context for a statute includes "otherstatutes on the same subject." Southern Pacific Trans. Co. v. Dept. of Rev., 316 Or 495, 498, 852 P2d 197 (1993). Accordingly, intervenors-respondents have not established that the definition of "Dwelling, Accessory" adopt......
  • BEST BUY IN TOWN, INC. v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, LUBA No. 98-051 (Or. LUBA 2/2/1999), LUBA No. 98-051.
    • United States
    • Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals
    • 2 Febrero 1999
    ...are to be considered. PGE v. Bureau of Labor and Industries, 317 Or 606, 610, 859 P2d 1143 (1993); Southern Pacific Trans. Co. v. Dept. of Rev., 316 Or 495, 498, 852 P2d 197 (1993) (the context for a statute includes "other statutes on the same subject"). As noted earlier in this opinion, w......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT